PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IJJ vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IJJ vs. TLT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IJJ (iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJJ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJJ returned 10.32%/yr vs -1.66%/yr for TLT. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. IJJ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.

Performance

IJJ vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJJ achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, IJJ has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 10.32%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.66% annualized return.

IJJ

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.82%
YTD
8.95%
6M
9.26%
1Y
20.64%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
10.32%

TLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.81%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
-1.80%
5Y*
-6.31%
10Y*
-1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJJ vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJJ
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF		8.95%7.27%11.63%15.24%-7.11%30.45%3.56%25.66%-12.06%12.04%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF		-0.27%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.12%-1.61%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IJJ and TLT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2002

-0.26

The correlation between IJJ and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF

Often compared with IJJ:
IJJ vs. IJHIJJ vs. VOEIJJ vs. SPYIJJ vs. PSRIJJ vs. VOOIJJ vs. IVVIJJ vs. VBR
Often compared with TLT:
TLT vs. SPYTLT vs. IEFTLT vs. TMFTLT vs. BNDTLT vs. VGLTTLT vs. TLTWTLT vs. EDV

Return for Risk

IJJ vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IJJ
IJJ Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJJ vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IJJTLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.36
0.51

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.06
0.80

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.09

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

0.65

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

1.63

+5.13

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IJJ vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJJ and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IJJTLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

0.51

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

-0.40

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

-0.11

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.26

+0.22

Drawdowns

IJJ vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJJ drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, which is greater than TLT's maximum drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJJ and TLT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IJJTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.00%

-48.35%

-9.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-7.58%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.68%

-19.18%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.68%

-43.70%

+21.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.11%

-48.35%

+2.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-40.44%

+40.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-13.82%

+5.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.04%

+0.02%

Volatility

IJJ vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.76%. This indicates that IJJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IJJTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

2.76%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

6.50%

+4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

9.77%

+5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.57%

15.87%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.04%

14.91%

+7.13%

IJJ vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJJ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IJJ vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

IJJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than TLT's 4.59% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJJ
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF		1.64%1.79%1.81%1.68%1.97%1.62%1.78%1.70%2.01%1.52%1.67%1.83%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF		4.59%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

IJJ and TLT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJJ has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to TLT (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJJ dropped -58.00% vs TLT's -48.35%.

On 10-year performance, IJJ leads with 10.32% vs -1.66% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJJ has performed better with a 10.32% return vs -1.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJJ.

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 1.64% for IJJ.

IJJ is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while TLT is Government Bonds. IJJ tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJJ and 0.15% for TLT.

IJJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJJ and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer