IJJ vs. RDIV
IJJ (iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - IJJ tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index while RDIV tracks the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJJ returned 11.30%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for RDIV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJJ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RDIV.
Performance
IJJ vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJJ achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly lower than RDIV's 15.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJJ having a 11.30% annualized return and RDIV not far ahead at 11.49%.
IJJ
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 3.60%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 22.58%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
RDIV
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 15.41%
- 6M
- 14.69%
- 1Y
- 30.60%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
IJJ vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 12.50% | 7.27% | 11.63% | 15.24% | -7.11% | 30.45% | 3.56% | 25.66% | -12.06% | 12.04% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 15.41% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 29.12% | -9.31% | 22.62% | -4.78% | 11.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJJ and RDIV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013 | 0.83 |
The correlation between IJJ and RDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IJJ vs. RDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJJ
RDIV
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
IJJ
RDIV
Industrials
IJJ
RDIV
-
Consumer Cyclical
IJJ
RDIV
Technology
IJJ
RDIV
Real Estate
IJJ
RDIV
Energy
IJJ
RDIV
Basic Materials
IJJ
RDIV
Consumer Defensive
IJJ
RDIV
Utilities
IJJ
RDIV
Healthcare
IJJ
RDIV
Communication Services
IJJ
RDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJJ vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank
IJJ
RDIV
IJJ vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IJJ | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.40 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 6.34 | -4.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 18.08 | -10.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IJJ vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJJ drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, which is greater than RDIV's maximum drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJJ and RDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJJ | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.00% | -49.97% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.59% | -4.84% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.68% | -17.91% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.68% | -24.89% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.11% | -49.97% | +3.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.14% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.92% | -5.84% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 1.70% | +1.36% |
Volatility
IJJ vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) is 3.94%, while Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that IJJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJJ | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 4.34% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 9.06% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.43% | 13.42% | +2.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.52% | 17.48% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.01% | 21.88% | +0.13% |
IJJ vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJJ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJJ vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison
IJJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than RDIV's 3.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.59% | 1.79% | 1.81% | 1.68% | 1.97% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.70% | 2.01% | 1.52% | 1.67% | 1.83% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.67% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJJ and RDIV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDIV has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to IJJ (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJJ dropped -58.00% vs RDIV's -49.97%.
On 10-year performance, RDIV leads with 11.49% vs 11.30% for IJJ. On fees, IJJ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IJJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 11.49% return vs 11.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJJ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 1.59% for IJJ.
IJJ tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJJ and 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJJ and RDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer