IJJ vs. AUSF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IJJ (iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - IJJ tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index while AUSF tracks the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IJJ returned 7.43%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for AUSF. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJJ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AUSF.

Performance

IJJ vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJJ achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly higher than AUSF's 6.72% return.

IJJ

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 8.95%
• 6M: 9.26%
• 1Y: 20.64%
• 3Y*: 13.80%
• 5Y*: 7.43%
• 10Y*: 10.32%

AUSF

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 6.72%
• 6M: 7.67%
• 1Y: 15.11%
• 3Y*: 20.14%
• 5Y*: 12.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJJ vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF	8.95%	7.27%	11.63%	15.24%	-7.11%	30.45%	3.56%	25.66%	-17.81%
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	6.72%	13.69%	16.05%	22.26%	-0.18%	27.48%	1.27%	24.06%	-10.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IJJ and AUSF is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018	0.87

The correlation between IJJ and AUSF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJJ vs. AUSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IJJ	AUSF
Financial Services	21.8%	18.7%
Industrials	18.8%	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	13.5%	7.8%
Real Estate	9.6%	4.1%
Technology	9.3%	13.5%
Energy	7.4%	5.2%
Basic Materials	6.0%	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	8.5%
Utilities	4.2%	4.0%
Healthcare	3.5%	12.0%
Communication Services	0.5%	10.6%

Return for Risk

IJJ vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJJ

IJJ Risk / Return Rank: 38
IJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
IJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
IJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
IJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
IJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 41

AUSF

AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 44
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJJ vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IJJ	AUSF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.50	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	2.18	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.26	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	2.60	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.76	7.54	-0.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IJJ vs. AUSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the AUSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJJ and AUSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IJJ	AUSF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	1.50	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.94	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.65	-0.17

Drawdowns

IJJ vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJJ drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, which is greater than AUSF's maximum drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJJ and AUSF.

Drawdown Indicators

	IJJ	AUSF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.00%	-44.25%	-13.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.59%	-5.84%	-4.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.68%	-12.29%	-10.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.68%	-14.23%	-8.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-2.26%	+1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.94%	-4.22%	-3.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	2.01%	+1.05%

Volatility

IJJ vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) at 2.41%. This indicates that IJJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IJJ	AUSF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	2.41%	+1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.67%	6.65%	+4.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.33%	10.14%	+5.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.57%	13.65%	+5.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.04%	19.07%	+2.97%

IJJ vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJJ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IJJ vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison

IJJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than AUSF's 2.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	2.76%	2.78%	2.63%	1.83%	2.51%	2.22%	2.95%	4.02%	1.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF	1.64%	1.79%	1.81%	1.68%	1.97%	1.62%	1.78%	1.70%	2.01%	1.52%	1.67%	1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IJJ and AUSF in my portfolio?

IJJ and AUSF have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IJJ or AUSF?

IJJ has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to AUSF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJJ dropped -58.00% vs AUSF's -44.25%.

Which ETF is better, IJJ or AUSF?

On 5-year performance, AUSF leads with 12.71% vs 7.43% for IJJ. On fees, IJJ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IJJ or AUSF?

Over the 5-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 7.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IJJ or AUSF?

IJJ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for AUSF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IJJ or AUSF?

AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.64% for IJJ.

What is the main difference between IJJ and AUSF?

IJJ tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJJ and 0.27% for AUSF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.