IJH vs. VFMV
IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. IJH is passively managed, while VFMV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IJH returned 8.26%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for VFMV. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJH charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.
Performance
IJH vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 8.76% return.
IJH
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- 26.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
VFMV
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 13.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- —
IJH vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 14.60% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.13% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 8.76% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJH and VFMV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between IJH and VFMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJH vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJH
VFMV
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
IJH
VFMV
Technology
IJH
VFMV
Financial Services
IJH
VFMV
Consumer Cyclical
IJH
VFMV
Healthcare
IJH
VFMV
Real Estate
IJH
VFMV
Energy
IJH
VFMV
Basic Materials
IJH
VFMV
-
Consumer Defensive
IJH
VFMV
Utilities
IJH
VFMV
Communication Services
IJH
VFMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJH vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
IJH
VFMV
IJH vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJH | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.27 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 2.26 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.93 | 8.85 | +2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJH | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 1.54 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.84 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.70 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
IJH vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and VFMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJH | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.07% | -33.64% | -21.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.83% | -6.00% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.10% | -10.35% | -13.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.10% | -15.41% | -8.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.81% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -3.64% | -3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 1.53% | +0.88% |
Volatility
IJH vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.04%. This indicates that IJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJH | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 2.04% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.31% | 6.30% | +5.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.50% | 8.80% | +6.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 11.75% | +7.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 14.25% | +6.92% |
IJH vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJH vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than VFMV's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.93% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJH and VFMV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJH has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to VFMV (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJH dropped -55.07% vs VFMV's -33.64%.
On 5-year performance, VFMV leads with 9.87% vs 8.26% for IJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMV has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFMV.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.18% for IJH.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IJH and 0.13% for VFMV.
IJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJH and VFMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer