IJH vs. IMCB

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) and IMCB (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds from iShares - IJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index while IMCB tracks the IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJH returned 10.97%/yr vs 11.25%/yr for IMCB. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IJH charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IMCB.

Performance

IJH vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 15.88% return, which is significantly lower than IMCB's 19.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJH having a 10.97% annualized return and IMCB not far ahead at 11.25%.

IJH

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 0.03%
• 6M: 10.44%
• YTD: 15.88%
• 1Y: 24.18%
• 3Y*: 13.99%
• 5Y*: 8.86%
• 10Y*: 10.97%
• ALL TIME*: 9.89%

IMCB

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: 14.82%
• YTD: 19.07%
• 1Y: 24.45%
• 3Y*: 17.04%
• 5Y*: 9.36%
• 10Y*: 11.25%
• ALL TIME*: 10.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF	$455.75M	$451.31M	$537.83M
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	$3.07M	$3.70M	$3.21M

IJH vs. IMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF	15.88%	7.42%	13.92%	16.40%	-13.11%	24.72%	13.60%	26.10%	-11.19%	16.26%
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	19.07%	10.25%	15.10%	16.37%	-16.09%	22.81%	13.35%	31.49%	-11.53%	19.70%

Correlation

The correlation between IJH and IMCB is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2004	0.95

The correlation between IJH and IMCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJH vs. IMCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IJH	IMCB
Industrials	25.2%	18.4%
Technology	17.5%	17.9%
Financial Services	13.9%	14.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	9.7%
Healthcare	8.9%	8.8%
Real Estate	7.2%	4.5%
Basic Materials	4.8%	5.5%
Energy	4.6%	7.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	5.1%
Utilities	2.8%	6.5%
Communication Services	1.5%	2.4%

Return for Risk

IJH vs. IMCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IJH

IJH Risk / Return Rank: 70
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 64
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 77

IMCB

IMCB Risk / Return Rank: 80
IMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
IMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
IMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 78
IMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
IMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IJH vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IJH	IMCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.89	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.66	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.34	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	3.05	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.01	12.23	-2.23

IJH vs. IMCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the IMCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJH and IMCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IJH vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, smaller than the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and IMCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	IJH	IMCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.07%	-58.80%	+3.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.83%	-8.05%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.10%	-19.80%	-4.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.10%	-25.15%	+1.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.18%	-40.99%	-1.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	0.00%	-1.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.53%	-7.68%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	2.00%	+0.42%

Volatility

IJH vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) at 2.51%. This indicates that IJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IJH	IMCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	2.51%	+1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.63%	9.95%	+1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.70%	13.05%	+2.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.68%	17.57%	+2.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.14%	19.61%	+1.53%

IJH vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IJH vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison

IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than IMCB's 1.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF	1.17%	1.36%	1.33%	1.46%	1.68%	1.18%	1.28%	1.63%	1.72%	1.19%	1.60%	1.56%
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	1.20%	1.42%	1.43%	1.55%	1.70%	1.08%	1.12%	1.32%	1.80%	1.31%	1.79%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IJH and IMCB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, IJH and IMCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IJH or IMCB?

IJH has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to IMCB (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJH dropped -55.07% vs IMCB's -58.80%.

Which ETF is better, IJH or IMCB?

On 10-year performance, IMCB leads with 11.25% vs 10.97% for IJH. On fees, IMCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IMCB has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IJH or IMCB?

Over the 10-year period, IMCB has performed better with a 11.25% return vs 10.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IJH or IMCB?

IMCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for IJH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IJH or IMCB?

IMCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 1.17% for IJH.

What is the main difference between IJH and IMCB?

IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while IMCB tracks IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IJH and 0.04% for IMCB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.