PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IIPR vs. RWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IIPR vs. RWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) and Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIPR achieves a 25.63% return, which is significantly higher than RWT's -2.41% return.


IIPR

1D
-1.17%
1M
8.26%
YTD
25.63%
6M
20.32%
1Y
18.90%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
-13.55%
10Y*

RWT

1D
-2.79%
1M
-6.79%
YTD
-2.41%
6M
-1.56%
1Y
7.19%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
-5.10%
10Y*
-1.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIPR vs. RWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IIPR
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
25.63%-18.40%-28.55%8.78%-59.02%47.49%151.33%72.52%43.88%82.30%
RWT
Redwood Trust, Inc.
-2.41%-4.08%-2.60%21.61%-42.26%60.13%-42.70%18.16%9.40%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between IIPR and RWT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2016

0.35

The correlation between IIPR and RWT shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.48 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

IIPR:

$4.14

RWT:

-$0.48

PS Ratio

IIPR:

6.17

RWT:

2.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

IIPR:

$263.23M

RWT:

$269.15M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IIPR:

$195.78M

RWT:

$1.06B

EBITDA (TTM)

IIPR:

$210.04M

RWT:

$1.06B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IIPR vs. RWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIPR
IIPR Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IIPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIPR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IIPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIPR Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

RWT
RWT Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
RWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWT Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIPR vs. RWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) and Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IIPRRWTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.08

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

0.36

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.17

0.74

+1.44

IIPR vs. RWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the RWT Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIPR and RWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IIPRRWTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

0.20

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

-0.15

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.11

+0.28

Drawdowns

IIPR vs. RWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIPR drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, smaller than the maximum RWT drawdown of -88.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIPR and RWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIPRRWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.42%

-88.91%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.29%

-19.91%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.92%

-33.79%

-29.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.42%

-55.83%

-22.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.83%

-58.93%

-10.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.00%

-45.58%

+8.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.72%

9.78%

-1.06%

Volatility

IIPR vs. RWT - Volatility Comparison

Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) has a higher volatility of 15.24% compared to Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) at 6.40%. This indicates that IIPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIPRRWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.24%

6.40%

+8.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.68%

28.77%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.97%

35.89%

+5.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.62%

35.07%

+6.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.43%

49.03%

-0.60%

Dividends

IIPR vs. RWT - Dividend Comparison

IIPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.27%, less than RWT's 13.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IIPR
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
13.27%16.05%11.28%7.16%7.01%2.18%2.44%3.73%1.87%1.70%0.00%0.00%
RWT
Redwood Trust, Inc.
13.79%13.02%10.26%9.58%13.61%5.91%8.26%7.26%7.83%7.56%7.36%8.48%

Financials

IIPR vs. RWT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. and Redwood Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
69.00M
87.30M
(IIPR) Total Revenue
(RWT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IIPR and RWT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IIPR has higher volatility (15.24%) compared to RWT (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIPR dropped -78.42% vs RWT's -88.91%.

IIPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IIPR and RWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer