PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RWT vs. MRCC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


RWTMRCC
YTD Return2.21%28.84%
1Y Return11.99%31.40%
3Y Return (Ann)-11.84%3.09%
5Y Return (Ann)-7.17%6.30%
10Y Return (Ann)-2.29%5.87%
Sharpe Ratio0.411.57
Sortino Ratio0.832.15
Omega Ratio1.101.27
Calmar Ratio0.191.25
Martin Ratio1.0612.42
Ulcer Index11.66%2.62%
Daily Std Dev30.18%20.73%
Max Drawdown-88.91%-57.63%
Current Drawdown-53.96%-1.55%

Fundamentals


RWTMRCC
Market Cap$958.93M$175.93M
EPS$0.55$0.37
PE Ratio12.8521.95
PEG Ratio1.392.05
Total Revenue (TTM)$734.84M$47.11M
Gross Profit (TTM)$697.77M$37.19M
EBITDA (TTM)$667.02M$25.46M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between RWT and MRCC is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

RWT vs. MRCC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, RWT achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than MRCC's 28.84% return. Over the past 10 years, RWT has underperformed MRCC with an annualized return of -2.29%, while MRCC has yielded a comparatively higher 5.87% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.26%
18.51%
RWT
MRCC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RWT vs. MRCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) and Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RWT, currently valued at 0.41, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RWT, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RWT, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RWT, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RWT, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.06
MRCC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MRCC, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.57
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MRCC, currently valued at 2.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.15
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MRCC, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MRCC, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MRCC, currently valued at 12.42, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0012.42

RWT vs. MRCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWT Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the MRCC Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWT and MRCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.41
1.57
RWT
MRCC

Dividends

RWT vs. MRCC - Dividend Comparison

RWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.23%, less than MRCC's 12.12% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RWT
Redwood Trust, Inc.
9.23%9.58%13.61%5.91%8.26%7.26%7.83%7.56%7.36%8.48%5.69%5.78%
MRCC
Monroe Capital Corporation
12.12%14.15%11.71%8.91%13.70%12.89%14.58%10.18%9.10%10.70%9.41%11.15%

Drawdowns

RWT vs. MRCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWT drawdown since its inception was -88.91%, which is greater than MRCC's maximum drawdown of -57.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWT and MRCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-39.42%
-1.55%
RWT
MRCC

Volatility

RWT vs. MRCC - Volatility Comparison

Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) has a higher volatility of 6.80% compared to Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC) at 6.28%. This indicates that RWT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.80%
6.28%
RWT
MRCC

Financials

RWT vs. MRCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Redwood Trust, Inc. and Monroe Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items