IIGD vs. FLRN
IIGD (Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF) and FLRN (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - IIGD tracks the Invesco Investment Grade Defensive Index while FLRN tracks the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IIGD returned 1.63%/yr vs 4.19%/yr for FLRN. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IIGD charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLRN.
Performance
IIGD vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IIGD achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than FLRN's 1.87% return.
IIGD
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 4.13%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- —
FLRN
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- 3.03%
IIGD vs. FLRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIGD Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF | 0.25% | 7.11% | 3.90% | 5.71% | -7.27% | -1.42% | 6.30% | 7.40% | 0.86% |
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.87% | 5.01% | 6.32% | 6.54% | 1.31% | 0.39% | 0.77% | 4.02% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IIGD and FLRN is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIGD vs. FLRN — Risk / Return Rank
IIGD
FLRN
IIGD vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IIGD | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -10.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 3.44 | -2.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 21.54 | -19.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.72 | 130.06 | -121.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IIGD | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 7.18 | -5.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 2.50 | -2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.50 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
IIGD vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIGD drawdown since its inception was -11.43%, smaller than the maximum FLRN drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIGD and FLRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIGD | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -14.64% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.67% | -0.23% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.14% | -1.43% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.43% | -2.16% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | 0.00% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -1.83% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.47% | 0.04% | +0.43% |
Volatility
IIGD vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) at 0.15%. This indicates that IIGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IIGD | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 0.15% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.65% | 0.52% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29% | 0.68% | +1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.66% | 1.69% | +1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 4.20% | -0.50% |
IIGD vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIGD has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRN's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IIGD vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison
IIGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than FLRN's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.51% | 4.89% | 5.67% | 5.68% | 1.95% | 0.39% | 1.22% | 2.76% | 2.39% | 1.64% | 1.06% | 0.63% |
IIGD Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF | 4.28% | 4.25% | 4.13% | 3.74% | 1.73% | 1.77% | 3.21% | 2.44% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IIGD and FLRN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IIGD has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to FLRN (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIGD dropped -11.43% vs FLRN's -14.64%.
On 5-year performance, FLRN leads with 4.19% vs 1.63% for IIGD. On fees, IIGD is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, FLRN has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLRN has performed better with a 4.19% return vs 1.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IIGD is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLRN.
FLRN has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 4.28% for IIGD.
IIGD tracks Invesco Investment Grade Defensive Index, while FLRN tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for IIGD and 0.15% for FLRN.
FLRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.18 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IIGD and FLRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer