FLRN vs. TFLO

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLRN having a 1.57% return and TFLO slightly lower at 1.51%. Over the past 10 years, FLRN has outperformed TFLO with an annualized return of 2.55%, while TFLO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.04% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Both FLRN and TFLO have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FLRN Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is lower than the TFLO Sharpe Ratio of 15.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRN and TFLO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FLRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, more than TFLO's 0.36% yield.

The maximum FLRN drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, which is greater than TFLO's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRN and TFLO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) has a higher volatility of 0.49% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.11%. This indicates that FLRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.