PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLRN vs. TFLO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FLRNTFLO
YTD Return2.21%1.76%
1Y Return7.02%5.49%
3Y Return (Ann)3.40%2.94%
5Y Return (Ann)2.65%2.12%
10Y Return (Ann)2.04%1.59%
Sharpe Ratio5.5915.46
Daily Std Dev1.28%0.36%
Max Drawdown-14.64%-5.01%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.0

The correlation between FLRN and TFLO is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FLRN vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FLRN achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly higher than TFLO's 1.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FLRN has outperformed TFLO with an annualized return of 2.04%, while TFLO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.59% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
3.45%
2.70%
FLRN
TFLO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF

iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF

FLRN vs. TFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLRN and TFLO have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
Expense ratio chart for FLRN: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for TFLO: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLRN vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLRN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLRN, currently valued at 5.59, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLRN, currently valued at 9.89, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.009.89
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FLRN, currently valued at 3.06, compared to the broader market1.001.502.003.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLRN, currently valued at 16.72, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0016.72
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FLRN, currently valued at 132.91, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.00132.91
TFLO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TFLO, currently valued at 15.46, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.0015.46
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TFLO, currently valued at 59.70, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0059.70
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TFLO, currently valued at 15.12, compared to the broader market1.001.502.0015.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TFLO, currently valued at 140.29, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00140.29
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TFLO, currently valued at 964.02, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.00964.02

FLRN vs. TFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRN Sharpe Ratio is 5.59, which is lower than the TFLO Sharpe Ratio of 15.46. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of FLRN and TFLO.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.0016.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
5.59
15.46
FLRN
TFLO

Dividends

FLRN vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison

FLRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than TFLO's 5.24% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
5.77%5.68%1.95%0.39%1.22%2.76%2.39%1.64%1.06%0.63%0.53%0.72%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
5.24%4.88%1.68%0.00%0.36%2.08%1.65%0.86%0.31%0.15%0.08%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLRN vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRN drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, which is greater than TFLO's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRN and TFLO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-0.10%-0.08%-0.06%-0.04%-0.02%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril00
FLRN
TFLO

Volatility

FLRN vs. TFLO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) has a higher volatility of 0.17% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.09%. This indicates that FLRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.10%0.15%0.20%0.25%0.30%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.17%
0.09%
FLRN
TFLO