IIGD vs. DEF
IIGD (Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF) and DEF (Invesco Defensive Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IIGD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Invesco Investment Grade Defensive Index, while DEF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Invesco Defensive Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IIGD returned 1.63%/yr vs 7.41%/yr for DEF. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IIGD charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for DEF.
Performance
IIGD vs. DEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IIGD achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than DEF's -2.29% return.
IIGD
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 4.13%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- —
DEF
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -2.29%
- 6M
- -2.55%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
IIGD vs. DEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIGD Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF | 0.25% | 7.11% | 3.90% | 5.71% | -7.27% | -1.42% | 6.30% | 7.40% | 0.86% |
DEF Invesco Defensive Equity ETF | -2.29% | 11.71% | 13.18% | 10.58% | -7.67% | 24.93% | 7.61% | 27.98% | -9.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between IIGD and DEF is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018 | 0.19 |
The correlation between IIGD and DEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IIGD vs. DEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IIGD
DEF
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Financial Services
IIGD
DEF
Industrials
IIGD
DEF
Technology
IIGD
DEF
Consumer Defensive
IIGD
DEF
Healthcare
IIGD
DEF
Energy
IIGD
DEF
Consumer Cyclical
IIGD
DEF
Real Estate
IIGD
DEF
Communication Services
IIGD
DEF
Basic Materials
IIGD
DEF
Utilities
IIGD
DEF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIGD vs. DEF — Risk / Return Rank
IIGD
DEF
IIGD vs. DEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) and Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IIGD | DEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.07 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 0.43 | +2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.72 | 1.18 | +7.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IIGD | DEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 0.36 | +1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.54 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.54 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
IIGD vs. DEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIGD drawdown since its inception was -11.43%, smaller than the maximum DEF drawdown of -47.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIGD and DEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIGD | DEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -47.91% | +36.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.67% | -9.76% | +8.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.14% | -15.00% | +12.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.43% | -17.75% | +6.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -6.44% | +5.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -6.24% | +3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.47% | 3.59% | -3.12% |
Volatility
IIGD vs. DEF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) is 0.75%, while Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that IIGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IIGD | DEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 3.12% | -2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.65% | 8.80% | -7.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29% | 11.73% | -9.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.66% | 13.92% | -10.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 16.05% | -12.35% |
IIGD vs. DEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIGD has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than DEF's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
IIGD vs. DEF - Dividend Comparison
IIGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than DEF's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEF Invesco Defensive Equity ETF | 0.96% | 0.94% | 0.79% | 1.60% | 1.48% | 1.06% | 1.34% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.63% | 2.18% | 3.31% |
IIGD Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF | 4.28% | 4.25% | 4.13% | 3.74% | 1.73% | 1.77% | 3.21% | 2.44% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IIGD and DEF have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DEF has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to IIGD (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIGD dropped -11.43% vs DEF's -47.91%.
On 5-year performance, DEF leads with 7.41% vs 1.63% for IIGD. On fees, IIGD is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, IIGD has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DEF has performed better with a 7.41% return vs 1.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IIGD is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for DEF.
IIGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 0.96% for DEF.
IIGD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DEF is Large Cap Growth Equities. IIGD tracks Invesco Investment Grade Defensive Index, while DEF tracks Invesco Defensive Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for IIGD and 0.53% for DEF.
IIGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IIGD and DEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer