IIGD vs. DEF
IIGD (Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF) and DEF (Invesco Defensive Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IIGD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Invesco Investment Grade Defensive Index, while DEF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Invesco Defensive Equity Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IIGD charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for DEF.
Performance
IIGD vs. DEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IIGD
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 3.58%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- —
DEF
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IIGD vs. DEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IIGD Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF | 0.29% |
DEF Invesco Defensive Equity ETF | -11.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between IIGD and DEF is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2026 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIGD vs. DEF — Risk / Return Rank
IIGD
DEF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IIGD vs. DEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) and Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IIGD | DEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.06 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IIGD vs. DEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIGD drawdown since its inception was -11.43%, roughly equal to the maximum DEF drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIGD and DEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIGD | DEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -11.11% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -11.11% | +10.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -9.26% | +6.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.51% | — | — |
Volatility
IIGD vs. DEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IIGD | DEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33% | 66.96% | -64.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.67% | 66.96% | -63.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 66.96% | -63.26% |
IIGD vs. DEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIGD has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than DEF's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
IIGD vs. DEF - Dividend Comparison
IIGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, while DEF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEF Invesco Defensive Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IIGD Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF | 4.27% | 4.25% | 4.13% | 3.74% | 1.73% | 1.77% | 3.21% | 2.44% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IIGD and DEF have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IIGD is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IIGD is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for DEF.
IIGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 0.00% for DEF.
IIGD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DEF is Large Cap Growth Equities. IIGD tracks Invesco Investment Grade Defensive Index, while DEF tracks Invesco Defensive Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for IIGD and 0.53% for DEF.
Find the right allocation for IIGD and DEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer