PortfoliosLab logo
FLRN vs. FLOT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLRN and FLOT is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FLRN vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLRN:

2.80

FLOT:

2.43

Sortino Ratio

FLRN:

3.55

FLOT:

3.06

Omega Ratio

FLRN:

2.24

FLOT:

2.18

Calmar Ratio

FLRN:

3.67

FLOT:

3.31

Martin Ratio

FLRN:

30.05

FLOT:

25.90

Ulcer Index

FLRN:

0.17%

FLOT:

0.20%

Daily Std Dev

FLRN:

1.88%

FLOT:

2.14%

Max Drawdown

FLRN:

-14.64%

FLOT:

-13.54%

Current Drawdown

FLRN:

-0.03%

FLOT:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRN achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than FLOT's 1.37% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: FLRN at 2.54% and FLOT at 2.54%.


FLRN

YTD

1.47%

1M

1.10%

6M

2.11%

1Y

5.22%

5Y*

3.58%

10Y*

2.54%

FLOT

YTD

1.37%

1M

1.23%

6M

2.14%

1Y

5.16%

5Y*

3.59%

10Y*

2.54%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLRN vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOT's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLRN vs. FLOT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLRN is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLRN is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLRN is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLRN is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLRN is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLRN is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLOT is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLOT is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLOT is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLOT is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLOT is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLOT is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLRN vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLRN Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the FLOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRN and FLOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FLRN vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison

FLRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, which matches FLOT's 5.45% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
5.43%5.67%5.68%1.95%0.39%1.22%2.76%2.39%1.64%1.06%0.63%0.53%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
5.45%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.45%0.97%0.53%0.44%

Drawdowns

FLRN vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRN drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, which is greater than FLOT's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRN and FLOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FLRN vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) is 0.66%, while iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) has a volatility of 0.89%. This indicates that FLRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...