IIGD vs. GSIG
IIGD (Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF) and GSIG (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - IIGD tracks the Invesco Investment Grade Defensive Index while GSIG tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IIGD charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for GSIG.
Performance
IIGD vs. GSIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IIGD
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 2.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.08%
- 5Y*
- 1.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.77%
GSIG
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $33.71K | $101.17K | $183.77K |
IIGD vs. GSIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIGD Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF | 0.22% | 7.11% | 3.90% | 5.71% | -7.27% | -1.42% | 0.67% |
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 0.68% | 6.69% | 4.72% | 6.06% | -5.80% | -0.81% | 1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between IIGD and GSIG is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IIGD and GSIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIGD vs. GSIG — Risk / Return Rank
IIGD
GSIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IIGD vs. GSIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) and Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IIGD | GSIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.44 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IIGD vs. GSIG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIGD | GSIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.38% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | — | — |
Volatility
IIGD vs. GSIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IIGD | GSIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.67% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.68% | — | — |
IIGD vs. GSIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIGD has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIG's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IIGD vs. GSIG - Dividend Comparison
IIGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than GSIG's 4.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 3.60% | 4.61% | 4.59% | 3.51% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IIGD Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF | 4.26% | 4.25% | 4.13% | 3.74% | 1.73% | 1.77% | 3.21% | 2.44% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IIGD and GSIG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IIGD is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IIGD is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for GSIG.
IIGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 3.60% for GSIG.
IIGD tracks Invesco Investment Grade Defensive Index, while GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for IIGD and 0.14% for GSIG.
Find the right allocation for IIGD and GSIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer