PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IIGD vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IIGD vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIGD achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.85% return.


IIGD

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.49%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIGD vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IIGD
Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF
0.25%7.11%3.90%5.71%-7.27%-1.42%6.30%7.40%0.86%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-12.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IIGD and IVV is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018

0.15

The correlation between IIGD and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IIGD vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IIGD
IVV

Financial Services

16.7%
11.8%

Industrials

11.6%
8.3%

Technology

8.7%
35.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
4.9%

Healthcare

5.5%
8.5%

Energy

5.5%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
10.1%

Real Estate

3.0%
1.9%

Communication Services

2.4%
11.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Utilities

1.3%
2.4%

Financial Services

IIGD
16.7%
IVV
11.8%

Industrials

IIGD
11.6%
IVV
8.3%

Technology

IIGD
8.7%
IVV
35.6%

Consumer Defensive

IIGD
5.6%
IVV
4.9%

Healthcare

IIGD
5.5%
IVV
8.5%

Energy

IIGD
5.5%
IVV
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IIGD
3.0%
IVV
10.1%

Real Estate

IIGD
3.0%
IVV
1.9%

Communication Services

IIGD
2.4%
IVV
11.2%

Basic Materials

IIGD
1.8%
IVV
1.8%

Utilities

IIGD
1.3%
IVV
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IIGD vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIGD
IIGD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IIGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIGD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IIGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIGD Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIGD vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IIGDIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.17

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

14.71

-5.99

IIGD vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIGD Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIGD and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IIGDIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.39

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.83

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.45

+0.32

Drawdowns

IIGD vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIGD drawdown since its inception was -11.43%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIGD and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIGDIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.43%

-55.25%

+43.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.67%

-8.89%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.14%

-18.75%

+16.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.43%

-24.53%

+13.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.76%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-10.78%

+8.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

1.91%

-1.44%

Volatility

IIGD vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) is 0.75%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that IIGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIGDIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

2.87%

-2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

8.90%

-7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29%

11.80%

-9.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.66%

16.88%

-13.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.70%

18.05%

-14.35%

IIGD vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IIGD has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IIGD vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

IIGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IIGD
Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF
4.28%4.25%4.13%3.74%1.73%1.77%3.21%2.44%1.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


IIGD and IVV have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVV has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to IIGD (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIGD dropped -11.43% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 5-year performance, IVV leads with 13.88% vs 1.63% for IIGD. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IIGD has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVV has performed better with a 13.88% return vs 1.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for IIGD.

IIGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

IIGD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IVV is S&P 500. IIGD tracks Invesco Investment Grade Defensive Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for IIGD and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IIGD and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer