PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IIGD vs. BSCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IIGD vs. BSCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIGD achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than BSCR's 1.27% return.


IIGD

1D
0.12%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.67%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
5.12%
5Y*
1.66%
10Y*

BSCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.66%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
1.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIGD vs. BSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IIGD
Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF
0.37%7.11%3.90%5.71%-7.27%-1.42%6.30%7.40%0.86%
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
1.27%5.77%4.52%6.41%-9.56%-1.72%9.68%14.88%-0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IIGD and BSCR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018

0.79

The correlation between IIGD and BSCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IIGD vs. BSCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IIGD
BSCR

Financial Services

16.7%
20.9%

Industrials

11.6%
6.6%

Technology

8.7%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
5.1%

Healthcare

5.5%
10.4%

Energy

5.5%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
12.1%

Real Estate

3.0%
3.0%

Communication Services

2.4%
4.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
0.9%

Utilities

1.3%
3.3%

Financial Services

IIGD
16.7%
BSCR
20.9%

Industrials

IIGD
11.6%
BSCR
6.6%

Technology

IIGD
8.7%
BSCR
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

IIGD
5.6%
BSCR
5.1%

Healthcare

IIGD
5.5%
BSCR
10.4%

Energy

IIGD
5.5%
BSCR
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IIGD
3.0%
BSCR
12.1%

Real Estate

IIGD
3.0%
BSCR
3.0%

Communication Services

IIGD
2.4%
BSCR
4.0%

Basic Materials

IIGD
1.8%
BSCR
0.9%

Utilities

IIGD
1.3%
BSCR
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IIGD vs. BSCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIGD
IIGD Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IIGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIGD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IIGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIGD Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCR
BSCR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIGD vs. BSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IIGDBSCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

2.10

-0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

10.69

-8.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

46.31

-37.82

IIGD vs. BSCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIGD Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the BSCR Sharpe Ratio of 4.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIGD and BSCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IIGDBSCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

4.20

-2.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.35

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.59

+0.18

Drawdowns

IIGD vs. BSCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIGD drawdown since its inception was -11.43%, smaller than the maximum BSCR drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIGD and BSCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIGDBSCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.43%

-17.26%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.67%

-0.42%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.14%

-2.41%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.43%

-14.87%

+3.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

0.00%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-3.34%

+0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.10%

+0.38%

Volatility

IIGD vs. BSCR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) at 0.19%. This indicates that IIGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIGDBSCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

0.19%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

0.59%

+1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29%

1.07%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.66%

4.09%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.70%

5.35%

-1.65%

IIGD vs. BSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IIGD has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCR's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IIGD vs. BSCR - Dividend Comparison

IIGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, which matches BSCR's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.29%4.26%4.27%3.74%2.65%2.12%2.46%3.11%3.35%0.78%
IIGD
Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF
4.27%4.25%4.13%3.74%1.73%1.77%3.21%2.44%1.23%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IIGD and BSCR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IIGD has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to BSCR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIGD dropped -11.43% vs BSCR's -17.26%.

On 5-year performance, IIGD leads with 1.66% vs 1.41% for BSCR. On fees, BSCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IIGD has performed better with a 1.66% return vs 1.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for IIGD.

BSCR has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 4.27% for IIGD.

IIGD tracks Invesco Investment Grade Defensive Index, while BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for IIGD and 0.10% for BSCR.

BSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IIGD and BSCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer