IHY vs. FLTR
IHY (VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF) and FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Ex-‐US Issuers High Yield Constrained Index, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IHY returned 4.19%/yr vs 3.49%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IHY charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
IHY vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHY achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 2.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IHY has outperformed FLTR with an annualized return of 4.19%, while FLTR has yielded a comparatively lower 3.49% annualized return.
IHY
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 4.89%
- 3Y*
- 8.50%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.19%
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 5.21%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 3.49%
IHY vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHY VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF | 0.65% | 13.39% | 3.55% | 12.11% | -14.34% | -2.82% | 8.65% | 12.77% | -4.52% | 12.54% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.19% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 1.44% | 5.70% | 0.30% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHY and FLTR is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2012 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHY vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
IHY
FLTR
IHY vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IHY | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -10.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 3.02 | -1.85 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 16.69 | -15.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | 97.91 | -94.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IHY vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHY drawdown since its inception was -27.63%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHY and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHY | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.63% | -17.84% | -9.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.75% | -0.31% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.75% | -1.93% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.91% | -3.06% | -23.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.63% | -17.84% | -9.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -0.00% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.26% | -0.67% | -4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.34% | 0.05% | +1.29% |
Volatility
IHY vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.29%. This indicates that IHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHY | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 0.29% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.03% | 0.66% | +3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.42% | 0.81% | +4.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.75% | 2.13% | +5.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.65% | 5.00% | +2.65% |
IHY vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHY has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHY vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
IHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than FLTR's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
IHY VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF | 5.71% | 5.31% | 5.60% | 5.26% | 4.97% | 4.55% | 4.65% | 4.86% | 4.70% | 4.36% | 5.11% | 5.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHY and FLTR have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHY has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to FLTR (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHY dropped -27.63% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
On 10-year performance, IHY leads with 4.19% vs 3.49% for FLTR. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, FLTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IHY has performed better with a 4.19% return vs 3.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IHY.
IHY has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 4.72% for FLTR.
IHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. IHY tracks Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Ex-‐US Issuers High Yield Constrained Index, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IHY and 0.14% for FLTR.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.50 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IHY and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer