IHRT vs. WULF
IHRT (iHeartMedia, Inc.) and WULF (TeraWulf Inc.) are both stocks. IHRT operates in Broadcasting (Communication Services), while WULF operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 3 years, IHRT returned 4.63%/yr vs 150.55%/yr for WULF. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IHRT vs. WULF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHRT achieves a -7.21% return, which is significantly lower than WULF's 146.39% return.
IHRT
- 1D
- 7.52%
- 1M
- -12.47%
- YTD
- -7.21%
- 6M
- -16.45%
- 1Y
- 110.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- -32.11%
- 10Y*
- —
WULF
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- 24.06%
- YTD
- 146.39%
- 6M
- 127.02%
- 1Y
- 656.95%
- 3Y*
- 150.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IHRT vs. WULF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHRT iHeartMedia, Inc. | -7.21% | 110.10% | -25.84% | -56.44% | -70.87% | 7.29% |
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 146.39% | 103.00% | 135.83% | 260.58% | -95.58% | -52.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHRT and WULF is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
IHRT:
-$2.47
WULF:
-$2.55
IHRT:
0.11
WULF:
67.76
IHRT:
$3.94B
WULF:
$168.06M
IHRT:
$1.44B
WULF:
$107.59M
IHRT:
$676.66M
WULF:
-$132.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHRT vs. WULF — Risk / Return Rank
IHRT
WULF
IHRT vs. WULF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IHRT | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.58 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 20.89 | -18.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 56.44 | -51.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IHRT vs. WULF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHRT drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, roughly equal to the maximum WULF drawdown of -98.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHRT and WULF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHRT | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.93% | -98.30% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.18% | -31.74% | -19.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.84% | -75.77% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.18% | -10.95% | -75.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.04% | -81.61% | +20.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.32% | 11.73% | +11.59% |
Volatility
IHRT vs. WULF - Volatility Comparison
iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) has a higher volatility of 26.38% compared to TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) at 23.77%. This indicates that IHRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WULF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHRT | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.38% | 23.77% | +2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.80% | 62.44% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 93.87% | 105.79% | -11.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.25% | 127.70% | -42.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.80% | 127.70% | -44.90% |
Dividends
IHRT vs. WULF - Dividend Comparison
Neither IHRT nor WULF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHRT iHeartMedia, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 33.22% |
Financials
IHRT vs. WULF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between iHeartMedia, Inc. and TeraWulf Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
IHRT and WULF have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHRT has higher volatility (26.38%) compared to WULF (23.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHRT dropped -96.93% vs WULF's -98.30%.
WULF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.28 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IHRT and WULF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer