PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHRT vs. CELC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IHRT vs. CELC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) and Celcuity Inc. (CELC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHRT achieves a -7.21% return, which is significantly higher than CELC's -9.84% return.


IHRT

1D
7.52%
1M
-12.47%
YTD
-7.21%
6M
-16.45%
1Y
110.93%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
-32.11%
10Y*

CELC

1D
2.47%
1M
-34.94%
YTD
-9.84%
6M
-11.08%
1Y
675.26%
3Y*
98.49%
5Y*
28.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHRT vs. CELC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IHRT
iHeartMedia, Inc.
-7.21%110.10%-25.84%-56.44%-70.87%62.10%-23.20%-6.76%
CELC
Celcuity Inc.
-9.84%661.96%-10.16%4.00%6.22%44.00%-13.91%-52.07%

Correlation

The correlation between IHRT and CELC is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.14

Fundamentals

EPS

IHRT:

-$2.47

CELC:

-$3.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

IHRT:

$3.94B

CELC:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

IHRT:

$1.44B

CELC:

-$41.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

IHRT:

$676.66M

CELC:

-$168.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHRT vs. CELC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHRT
IHRT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IHRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHRT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IHRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHRT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

CELC
CELC Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CELC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CELC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CELC Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CELC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CELC Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHRT vs. CELC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) and Celcuity Inc. (CELC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IHRTCELCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.95

-0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

17.14

-14.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

56.87

-52.09

IHRT vs. CELC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the CELC Sharpe Ratio of 3.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHRT and CELC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IHRT vs. CELC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHRT drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than CELC's maximum drawdown of -85.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHRT and CELC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHRTCELCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.93%

-85.64%

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.18%

-39.77%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.84%

-61.99%

-19.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.93%

-82.70%

-14.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.18%

-37.97%

-48.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.04%

-44.95%

-16.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.32%

11.96%

+11.36%

Volatility

IHRT vs. CELC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) is 26.38%, while Celcuity Inc. (CELC) has a volatility of 32.15%. This indicates that IHRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CELC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHRTCELCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.38%

32.15%

-5.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.80%

49.61%

+12.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.87%

182.63%

-88.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

85.25%

101.52%

-16.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.80%

91.58%

-8.78%

Dividends

IHRT vs. CELC - Dividend Comparison

Neither IHRT nor CELC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

IHRT vs. CELC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between iHeartMedia, Inc. and Celcuity Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
884.20M
0
(IHRT) Total Revenue
(CELC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IHRT and CELC have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CELC has higher volatility (32.15%) compared to IHRT (26.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHRT dropped -96.93% vs CELC's -85.64%.

CELC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHRT and CELC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer