IGV vs. YCS
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Technology-Software Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGV returned 16.89%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for YCS. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGV charges 0.46%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
IGV vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has outperformed YCS with an annualized return of 16.89%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively lower 12.34% annualized return.
IGV
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- 13.30%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- -4.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.89%
YCS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 32.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 23.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
IGV vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | -5.19% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.17% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and YCS is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2008 | 0.16 |
The correlation between IGV and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
YCS
IGV vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGV | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.35 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 3.97 | -4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 12.40 | -12.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGV | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 | 1.92 | -2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 1.12 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.65 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.33 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
IGV vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -49.56% | -13.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -8.30% | -28.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -23.05% | -13.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -27.32% | -18.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | -27.32% | -18.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.93% | 0.00% | -14.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.44% | -19.93% | +5.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.22% | 2.66% | +14.56% |
Volatility
IGV vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) has a higher volatility of 11.63% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.63% | 2.75% | +8.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.39% | 12.32% | +12.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.61% | 17.27% | +10.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.86% | 21.10% | +6.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.35% | 19.01% | +7.34% |
IGV vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGV nor YCS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and YCS have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (11.63%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 16.89% vs 12.34% for YCS. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 16.89% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
IGV and YCS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IGV and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer