PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGV vs. TOLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGV vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -17.37% return, which is significantly lower than TOLZ's 12.09% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has outperformed TOLZ with an annualized return of 15.70%, while TOLZ has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.


IGV

1D
0.01%
1M
-7.10%
YTD
-17.37%
6M
-19.19%
1Y
-17.89%
3Y*
9.05%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
15.70%

TOLZ

1D
0.88%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
12.09%
6M
12.14%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
15.12%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGV vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
-17.37%5.56%23.41%58.56%-35.65%12.30%52.86%34.33%12.44%42.16%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
12.09%14.76%11.67%6.18%-4.25%20.47%-9.46%26.84%-7.90%13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between IGV and TOLZ is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2014

0.40

The correlation between IGV and TOLZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IGV vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGV
TOLZ

Technology

89.1%
0.4%

Communication Services

8.6%

-

Financial Services

1.9%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
0.8%

Industrials

0.1%
5.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

4.4%

Energy

-

36.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

7.9%

Utilities

-

22.2%

Technology

IGV
89.1%
TOLZ
0.4%

Communication Services

IGV
8.6%
TOLZ

-

Financial Services

IGV
1.9%
TOLZ
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IGV
0.3%
TOLZ
0.8%

Industrials

IGV
0.1%
TOLZ
5.1%

Basic Materials

IGV

-

TOLZ

-

Consumer Defensive

IGV

-

TOLZ
4.4%

Energy

IGV

-

TOLZ
36.0%

Healthcare

IGV

-

TOLZ

-

Real Estate

IGV

-

TOLZ
7.9%

Utilities

IGV

-

TOLZ
22.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGV vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGV
IGV Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

TOLZ
TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGV vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGVTOLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.27

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

3.17

-3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

9.16

-10.16

IGV vs. TOLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGV Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the TOLZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGV and TOLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGV vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than TOLZ's maximum drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and TOLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGVTOLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.45%

-39.33%

-24.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.61%

-5.18%

-31.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.61%

-11.94%

-24.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.85%

-21.85%

-24.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.85%

-39.33%

-6.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.85%

-2.45%

-23.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.46%

-6.61%

-7.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.94%

1.79%

+16.15%

Volatility

IGV vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a higher volatility of 12.71% compared to ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) at 3.24%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGVTOLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.71%

3.24%

+9.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.86%

8.30%

+16.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.27%

10.41%

+17.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.97%

13.98%

+13.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.38%

16.23%

+10.15%

IGV vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGV vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison

IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than TOLZ's 3.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
0.02%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.01%0.00%0.35%0.02%0.16%0.09%0.82%0.22%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
3.63%3.99%3.53%3.34%3.01%3.28%3.16%2.96%3.63%3.30%2.62%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGV and TOLZ have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGV has higher volatility (12.71%) compared to TOLZ (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.

On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 15.70% vs 7.93% for TOLZ. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.

IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while TOLZ is Industrials Equities. IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.46% for TOLZ.

TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGV and TOLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer