PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGV vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGV vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -17.37% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's -13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has outperformed SLV with an annualized return of 15.70%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.68% annualized return.


IGV

1D
0.01%
1M
-7.10%
YTD
-17.37%
6M
-19.19%
1Y
-17.89%
3Y*
9.05%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
15.70%

SLV

1D
-5.40%
1M
-18.48%
YTD
-13.49%
6M
-14.05%
1Y
69.08%
3Y*
39.38%
5Y*
18.31%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGV vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
-17.37%5.56%23.41%58.56%-35.65%12.30%52.86%34.33%12.44%42.16%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-13.49%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IGV and SLV is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGV vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGV
IGV Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGV vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGVSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.25

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

1.47

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

3.16

-4.16

IGV vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGV Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGV and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGV vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGVSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.45%

-76.28%

+12.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.61%

-47.23%

+10.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.61%

-47.23%

+10.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.85%

-47.23%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.85%

-47.23%

+1.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.85%

-47.23%

+21.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.46%

-44.65%

+30.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.94%

21.91%

-3.97%

Volatility

IGV vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) is 12.71%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 14.34%. This indicates that IGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGVSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.71%

14.34%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.86%

59.27%

-34.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.27%

60.33%

-32.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.97%

36.59%

-8.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.38%

32.09%

-5.71%

IGV vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGV vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
0.02%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.01%0.00%0.35%0.02%0.16%0.09%0.82%0.22%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGV and SLV have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to IGV (12.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 15.70% vs 12.68% for SLV. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGV has been the lower-risk option at 12.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

IGV has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while SLV is Silver. IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.50% for SLV.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGV and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer