IGV vs. KROP
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IGV tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGV returned 3.63%/yr vs -11.81%/yr for KROP. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.
Performance
IGV vs. KROP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -7.81% return, which is significantly lower than KROP's 15.64% return.
IGV
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- YTD
- -7.81%
- 1Y
- -10.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- 16.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.49%
KROP
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 15.64%
- 1Y
- 11.84%
- 3Y*
- 0.14%
- 5Y*
- -11.81%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -12.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.47B | $1.27B | $1.69B | |
| $48.18K | $49.05K | $92.40K |
IGV vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -7.81% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 0.55% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 15.64% | 7.95% | -8.74% | -23.86% | -27.23% | -19.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and KROP is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IGV and KROP has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IGV vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
KROP
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGV
KROP
-
Communication Services
IGV
KROP
-
Financial Services
IGV
KROP
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
KROP
Industrials
IGV
KROP
Basic Materials
IGV
-
KROP
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
KROP
Energy
IGV
-
KROP
-
Healthcare
IGV
-
KROP
Real Estate
IGV
-
KROP
-
Utilities
IGV
-
KROP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
KROP
IGV vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGV | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.14 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 1.23 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.53 | 2.56 | -3.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGV vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, roughly equal to the maximum KROP drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and KROP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -62.08% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -9.67% | -26.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -25.19% | -11.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -61.96% | +16.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.28% | -49.50% | +32.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.49% | -44.81% | +30.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.38% | 4.63% | +14.75% |
Volatility
IGV vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.77%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.40% | 4.77% | +2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.09% | 12.77% | +12.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.25% | 16.50% | +12.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.21% | 22.13% | +6.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.47% | 22.11% | +4.36% |
IGV vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison
IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than KROP's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 2.13% | 2.73% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and KROP have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to KROP (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs KROP's -62.08%.
On 5-year performance, IGV leads with 3.63% vs -11.81% for KROP. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IGV has performed better with a 3.63% return vs -11.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.
KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.50% for KROP.
KROP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and KROP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer