IGV vs. KROP
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IGV tracks the S&P North American Technology-Software Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGV returned 14.91%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for KROP. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGV charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.
Performance
IGV vs. KROP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than KROP's 16.34% return.
IGV
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- 13.30%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- -4.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.89%
KROP
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 13.67%
- 3Y*
- 0.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGV vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | -5.19% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 1.27% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 16.34% | 7.95% | -8.74% | -23.86% | -27.23% | -18.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and KROP is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.41 |
The correlation between IGV and KROP shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IGV vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
KROP
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGV
KROP
-
Communication Services
IGV
KROP
-
Financial Services
IGV
KROP
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
KROP
Industrials
IGV
KROP
Basic Materials
IGV
-
KROP
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
KROP
Energy
IGV
-
KROP
-
Healthcare
IGV
-
KROP
Real Estate
IGV
-
KROP
-
Utilities
IGV
-
KROP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
KROP
IGV vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGV | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.16 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 1.22 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 2.75 | -3.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGV | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 | 0.86 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | -0.57 | +0.94 |
Drawdowns
IGV vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, roughly equal to the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and KROP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -61.96% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -11.29% | -25.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -28.70% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.93% | -49.05% | +34.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.44% | -44.50% | +30.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.22% | 4.99% | +12.23% |
Volatility
IGV vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) has a higher volatility of 11.63% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.77%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.63% | 4.77% | +6.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.39% | 12.01% | +12.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.61% | 16.04% | +11.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.86% | 22.28% | +5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.35% | 22.28% | +4.07% |
IGV vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison
IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 2.35% | 2.73% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and KROP have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (11.63%) compared to KROP (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs KROP's -61.96%.
On 3-year performance, IGV leads with 14.91% vs 0.81% for KROP. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IGV has performed better with a 14.91% return vs 0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.
KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.00% for IGV.
IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IGV and 0.50% for KROP.
KROP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and KROP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer