IGV vs. IYH
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGV returned 15.87%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for IYH. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IYH.
Performance
IGV vs. IYH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -14.18% return, which is significantly lower than IYH's -0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has outperformed IYH with an annualized return of 15.87%, while IYH has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.
IGV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- -14.18%
- 6M
- -16.00%
- 1Y
- -15.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.87%
IYH
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 14.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
IGV vs. IYH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -14.18% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | -0.65% | 13.16% | 2.99% | 2.14% | -4.46% | 23.41% | 15.56% | 20.80% | 5.80% | 22.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and IYH is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2001 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IGV and IYH has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IGV vs. IYH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
IYH
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGV
IYH
-
Communication Services
IGV
IYH
-
Financial Services
IGV
IYH
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
IYH
-
Industrials
IGV
IYH
-
Basic Materials
IGV
-
IYH
-
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
IYH
-
Energy
IGV
-
IYH
-
Healthcare
IGV
-
IYH
Real Estate
IGV
-
IYH
-
Utilities
IGV
-
IYH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. IYH — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
IYH
IGV vs. IYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGV | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.17 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 1.33 | -1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 3.18 | -4.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGV vs. IYH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than IYH's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and IYH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -43.12% | -20.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -10.64% | -25.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -17.91% | -18.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -17.91% | -27.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | -28.40% | -17.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.00% | -3.94% | -19.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.45% | -8.96% | -5.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.55% | 4.46% | +13.09% |
Volatility
IGV vs. IYH - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a higher volatility of 12.57% compared to iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) at 4.94%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.57% | 4.94% | +7.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.80% | 10.64% | +14.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.06% | 15.10% | +12.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 14.96% | +12.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.39% | 16.74% | +9.65% |
IGV vs. IYH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IYH's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. IYH - Dividend Comparison
IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 1.25% | 1.19% | 1.25% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and IYH have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to IYH (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs IYH's -43.12%.
On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 15.87% vs 9.52% for IYH. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IYH has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 15.87% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.
IYH has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.00% for IGV.
IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while IYH is Health & Biotech Equities. IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.43% for IYH.
IYH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and IYH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer