IGV vs. IWM

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGV returned 15.79%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for IWM. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

IGV vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -11.33% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 20.58% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 15.79%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.82% annualized return.

IGV

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 2.55%
• 6M: -6.08%
• YTD: -11.33%
• 1Y: -14.65%
• 3Y*: 8.87%
• 5Y*: 3.81%
• 10Y*: 15.79%

IWM

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.20%
• 6M: 11.79%
• YTD: 20.58%
• 1Y: 35.13%
• 3Y*: 16.52%
• 5Y*: 7.91%
• 10Y*: 10.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGV vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF	-11.33%	5.56%	23.41%	58.56%	-35.65%	12.30%	52.86%	34.33%	12.44%	42.16%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	20.58%	12.66%	11.38%	16.83%	-20.48%	14.54%	20.03%	25.39%	-11.12%	14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IGV and IWM is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2001	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between IGV and IWM has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IGV vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGV	IWM
Technology	89.1%	14.9%
Communication Services	8.6%	2.0%
Financial Services	1.9%	18.1%
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	8.9%
Industrials	0.1%	13.8%
Basic Materials	-	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.5%
Energy	-	5.7%
Healthcare	-	20.1%
Real Estate	-	6.3%
Utilities	-	2.9%

Return for Risk

IGV vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGV

IGV Risk / Return Rank: 5
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 5
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 6

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 72
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 63
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGV vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IGV	IWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	1.82	-2.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.56	2.58	-3.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.31	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.40	3.20	-3.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.78	11.30	-12.08

IGV vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGV Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGV and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IGV vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and IWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGV	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.45%	-59.05%	-4.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.61%	-11.03%	-25.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.61%	-27.50%	-9.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.85%	-31.91%	-13.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.85%	-41.13%	-4.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.44%	-1.62%	-18.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.48%	-10.72%	-3.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.79%	3.12%	+15.67%

Volatility

IGV vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 3.72%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGV	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.72%	3.72%	+4.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.28%	14.17%	+11.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.66%	19.39%	+9.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.09%	22.54%	+5.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.40%	23.00%	+3.40%

IGV vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGV vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than IWM's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.35%	0.02%	0.16%	0.09%	0.82%	0.22%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.90%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGV and IWM in my portfolio?

IGV and IWM have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGV or IWM?

IGV has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to IWM (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs IWM's -59.05%.

Which ETF is better, IGV or IWM?

On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 15.79% vs 10.82% for IWM. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGV or IWM?

Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 15.79% return vs 10.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGV or IWM?

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGV or IWM?

IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.

What is the main difference between IGV and IWM?

IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.19% for IWM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.