PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGV vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGV vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.


IGV

1D
-4.33%
1M
13.30%
YTD
-5.19%
6M
-6.07%
1Y
-4.56%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
16.89%

IBIT

1D
-2.76%
1M
-18.50%
YTD
-25.48%
6M
-29.84%
1Y
-38.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGV vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET
-5.19%5.56%22.86%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-25.48%-6.41%99.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IGV and IBIT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGV vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGV
IGV Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGV vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGVIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.86

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

-0.79

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.27

-1.36

+1.10

IGV vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGV Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGV and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGVIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

-0.89

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.30

+0.07

Drawdowns

IGV vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGVIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.45%

-49.36%

-14.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.61%

-49.36%

+12.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.93%

-48.10%

+33.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.44%

-16.02%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.22%

28.44%

-11.22%

Volatility

IGV vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) has a higher volatility of 11.63% compared to iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) at 9.50%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGVIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.63%

9.50%

+2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.39%

34.44%

-10.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.61%

43.73%

-16.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.86%

50.19%

-22.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.35%

50.19%

-23.84%

IGV vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGV has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGV vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGV nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.01%0.00%0.35%0.02%0.16%0.09%0.82%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGV and IBIT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGV has higher volatility (11.63%) compared to IBIT (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs IBIT's -49.36%.

On 1-year performance, IGV leads with -4.56% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IBIT has been the lower-risk option at 9.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IGV has performed better with a -4.56% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IGV.

IGV and IBIT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IGV and 0.25% for IBIT.

IGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGV and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer