IGV vs. FFTY

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and FFTY (CapForce IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while FFTY is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGV returned 16.04%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for FFTY. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.

Performance

IGV vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -7.81% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 6.64% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has outperformed FFTY with an annualized return of 16.04%, while FFTY has yielded a comparatively lower 5.49% annualized return.

IGV

• 1D: 3.00%
• 1M: 4.11%
• 6M: 8.85%
• YTD: -7.81%
• 1Y: -10.30%
• 3Y*: 12.00%
• 5Y*: 3.63%
• 10Y*: 16.04%
• ALL TIME*: 9.49%

FFTY

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -8.71%
• 6M: 3.25%
• YTD: 6.64%
• 1Y: 13.68%
• 3Y*: 15.53%
• 5Y*: -3.22%
• 10Y*: 5.49%
• ALL TIME*: 4.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF	$850.81K	$1.10M	$1.54M
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF	$1.47B	$1.27B	$1.69B

IGV vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF	-7.81%	5.56%	23.41%	58.56%	-35.65%	12.30%	52.86%	34.33%	12.44%	42.16%
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF	6.64%	23.38%	18.36%	12.40%	-51.08%	11.92%	18.20%	25.74%	-16.76%	37.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IGV and FFTY is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2015	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between IGV and FFTY has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IGV vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGV	FFTY
Technology	89.3%	18.5%
Communication Services	8.3%	0.9%
Financial Services	1.9%	20.9%
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	3.6%
Industrials	0.1%	5.7%
Basic Materials	-	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.0%
Energy	-	2.6%
Healthcare	-	43.7%
Real Estate	-	0.5%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

IGV vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IGV

IGV Risk / Return Rank: 7
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 7
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 7

FFTY

FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 21
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 21
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IGV vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IGV	FFTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.35	0.38	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.31	0.73	-1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.09	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	0.59	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.53	1.43	-1.97

IGV vs. FFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGV Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the FFTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGV and FFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IGV vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than FFTY's maximum drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and FFTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGV	FFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.45%	-59.46%	-3.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.61%	-23.29%	-13.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.61%	-29.60%	-7.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.85%	-59.46%	+13.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.85%	-59.46%	+13.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.28%	-24.84%	+7.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.49%	-22.32%	+7.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.38%	9.56%	+9.82%

Volatility

IGV vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) have volatilities of 7.40% and 7.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGV	FFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.40%	7.60%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.09%	28.17%	-3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.25%	36.43%	-7.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.21%	29.75%	-1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.47%	27.80%	-1.33%

IGV vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGV vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than FFTY's 1.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF	1.26%	1.35%	0.91%	0.65%	2.75%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.35%	0.02%	0.16%	0.09%	0.82%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGV and FFTY in my portfolio?

IGV and FFTY have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGV or FFTY?

FFTY has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to IGV (7.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs FFTY's -59.46%.

Which ETF is better, IGV or FFTY?

On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 16.04% vs 5.49% for FFTY. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGV has been the lower-risk option at 7.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGV or FFTY?

Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 16.04% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGV or FFTY?

IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGV or FFTY?

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.

What is the main difference between IGV and FFTY?

IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while FFTY is Mid Cap Growth Equities. IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and CapForce. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.80% for FFTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.