FFTY vs. BFOR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FFTY (CapForce IBD 50 ETF) and BFOR (ALPS Barron's 400 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFTY is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index, while BFOR is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Barron's 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FFTY returned 5.57%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for BFOR. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FFTY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BFOR.

Performance

FFTY vs. BFOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFTY achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly lower than BFOR's 15.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FFTY has underperformed BFOR with an annualized return of 5.57%, while BFOR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.

FFTY

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -9.03%
• 6M: 3.47%
• YTD: 6.26%
• 1Y: 13.28%
• 3Y*: 13.48%
• 5Y*: -2.78%
• 10Y*: 5.57%
• ALL TIME*: 4.04%

BFOR

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -0.61%
• 6M: 11.25%
• YTD: 15.05%
• 1Y: 23.90%
• 3Y*: 17.17%
• 5Y*: 10.70%
• 10Y*: 12.64%
• ALL TIME*: 11.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF	$667.88K	$621.15K	$445.26K
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF	$863.41K	$1.19M	$1.59M

FFTY vs. BFOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF	6.26%	23.38%	18.36%	12.40%	-51.08%	11.92%	18.20%	25.74%	-16.76%	37.62%
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF	15.05%	13.85%	17.81%	18.19%	-15.92%	30.71%	17.60%	21.30%	-13.86%	19.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FFTY and BFOR is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2015	0.75

The correlation between FFTY and BFOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFTY vs. BFOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFTY	BFOR
Healthcare	43.7%	11.9%
Financial Services	20.9%	21.8%
Technology	18.5%	20.9%
Industrials	5.7%	16.4%
Basic Materials	3.6%	2.4%
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	10.9%
Energy	2.6%	6.4%
Utilities	2.1%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.0%	4.0%
Communication Services	0.9%	3.5%
Real Estate	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

FFTY vs. BFOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFTY

FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 18
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 18

BFOR

BFOR Risk / Return Rank: 68
BFOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BFOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BFOR Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BFOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
BFOR Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFTY vs. BFOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFTY	BFOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	1.50	-1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	2.24	-1.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.26	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	2.48	-2.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.00	9.03	-8.02

FFTY vs. BFOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the BFOR Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFTY and BFOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFTY vs. BFOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTY drawdown since its inception was -59.46%, which is greater than BFOR's maximum drawdown of -41.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTY and BFOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFTY	BFOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.46%	-41.27%	-18.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.29%	-8.98%	-14.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.60%	-21.91%	-7.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.46%	-25.93%	-33.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.46%	-41.27%	-18.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.10%	-0.92%	-24.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.32%	-6.36%	-15.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.51%	2.46%	+7.05%

Volatility

FFTY vs. BFOR - Volatility Comparison

CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) at 3.05%. This indicates that FFTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFTY	BFOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.45%	3.05%	+5.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.16%	10.73%	+18.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.53%	14.84%	+21.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.75%	19.40%	+10.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.79%	20.34%	+7.45%

FFTY vs. BFOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOR's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFTY vs. BFOR - Dividend Comparison

FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than BFOR's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF	0.52%	0.60%	0.69%	1.26%	1.68%	0.92%	0.98%	0.69%	0.94%	0.60%	0.78%	0.86%
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF	1.27%	1.35%	0.91%	0.65%	2.75%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFTY and BFOR in my portfolio?

FFTY and BFOR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFTY or BFOR?

FFTY has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to BFOR (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTY dropped -59.46% vs BFOR's -41.27%.

Which ETF is better, FFTY or BFOR?

On 10-year performance, BFOR leads with 12.64% vs 5.57% for FFTY. On fees, BFOR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BFOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFTY or BFOR?

Over the 10-year period, BFOR has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFTY or BFOR?

BFOR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFTY or BFOR?

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.52% for BFOR.

What is the main difference between FFTY and BFOR?

FFTY is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BFOR is Mid Cap Blend Equities. FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index, while BFOR tracks Barron's 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: CapForce and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFTY and 0.65% for BFOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BFOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.