IGV vs. CRTC
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IGV tracks the S&P North American Technology-Software Index while CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IGV returned -4.56% vs 23.78% for CRTC. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGV charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.
Performance
IGV vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than CRTC's 8.59% return.
IGV
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- 13.30%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- -4.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.89%
CRTC
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 8.79%
- 1Y
- 23.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGV vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | -5.19% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 8.84% |
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | 8.59% | 18.69% | 18.05% | 7.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and CRTC is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023 | 0.78 |
The correlation between IGV and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGV vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
CRTC
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGV
CRTC
Communication Services
IGV
CRTC
Financial Services
IGV
CRTC
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
CRTC
Industrials
IGV
CRTC
Basic Materials
IGV
-
CRTC
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
CRTC
Energy
IGV
-
CRTC
Healthcare
IGV
-
CRTC
Real Estate
IGV
-
CRTC
Utilities
IGV
-
CRTC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
CRTC
IGV vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGV | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.32 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 2.64 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 9.88 | -10.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGV | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 | 1.87 | -2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.36 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
IGV vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and CRTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -19.07% | -44.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -9.05% | -27.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.93% | -1.27% | -13.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.44% | -2.13% | -12.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.22% | 2.41% | +14.81% |
Volatility
IGV vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) has a higher volatility of 11.63% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 3.20%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.63% | 3.20% | +8.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.39% | 9.64% | +14.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.61% | 12.76% | +14.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.86% | 15.73% | +12.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.35% | 15.73% | +10.62% |
IGV vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison
IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | 1.00% | 1.03% | 1.13% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and CRTC have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (11.63%) compared to CRTC (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs CRTC's -19.07%.
On 1-year performance, CRTC leads with 23.78% vs -4.56% for IGV. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CRTC has performed better with a 23.78% return vs -4.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IGV.
CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for IGV.
IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IGV and 0.35% for CRTC.
CRTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and CRTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer