IGV vs. BWET
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Technology-Software Index, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGV returned 14.91%/yr vs 129.64%/yr for BWET. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. IGV charges 0.46%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.
Performance
IGV vs. BWET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 875.88% return.
IGV
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- 13.30%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- -4.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.89%
BWET
- 1D
- 4.26%
- 1M
- 9.15%
- YTD
- 875.88%
- 6M
- 735.56%
- 1Y
- 1,800.91%
- 3Y*
- 129.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGV vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | -5.19% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 40.45% |
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 875.88% | 96.22% | -39.21% | 15.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and BWET is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023 | -0.08 |
The correlation between IGV and BWET shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.07 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IGV vs. BWET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
BWET
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGV
BWET
-
Communication Services
IGV
BWET
-
Financial Services
IGV
BWET
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
BWET
-
Industrials
IGV
BWET
-
Basic Materials
IGV
-
BWET
-
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
BWET
-
Energy
IGV
-
BWET
-
Healthcare
IGV
-
BWET
-
Real Estate
IGV
-
BWET
-
Utilities
IGV
-
BWET
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
BWET
IGV vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGV | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -18.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.96 | -0.97 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 59.51 | -59.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 158.07 | -158.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGV | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 | 18.57 | -18.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.90 | -1.53 |
Drawdowns
IGV vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than BWET's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and BWET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -56.90% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -30.64% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -56.90% | +20.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.93% | -11.29% | -3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.44% | -24.09% | +9.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.22% | 11.51% | +5.71% |
Volatility
IGV vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) is 11.63%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 33.96%. This indicates that IGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.63% | 33.96% | -22.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.39% | 88.49% | -64.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.61% | 98.35% | -70.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.86% | 70.45% | -42.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.35% | 70.45% | -44.10% |
IGV vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGV nor BWET has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and BWET have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWET has higher volatility (33.96%) compared to IGV (11.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs BWET's -56.90%.
On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 129.64% vs 14.91% for IGV. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IGV has been the lower-risk option at 11.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 129.64% return vs 14.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.
IGV and BWET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while BWET is Commodities. IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index, while BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IGV and 3.50% for BWET.
BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.57 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and BWET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer