IGMIX vs. IRLNX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IGMIX (VY Invesco Oppenheimer Global Portfolio) and IRLNX (Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio) are both mutual funds - IGMIX is a Global Equities fund managed by Voya, while IRLNX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Voya. Over the past 10 years, IGMIX returned 13.11%/yr vs 19.15%/yr for IRLNX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGMIX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IRLNX.

Performance

IGMIX vs. IRLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VY Invesco Oppenheimer Global Portfolio (IGMIX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGMIX achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly higher than IRLNX's 3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IGMIX has underperformed IRLNX with an annualized return of 13.11%, while IRLNX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.15% annualized return.

IGMIX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 2.55%
• YTD: 10.46%
• 6M: 8.65%
• 1Y: 29.35%
• 3Y*: 17.02%
• 5Y*: 6.72%
• 10Y*: 13.11%

IRLNX

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: -2.73%
• YTD: 3.68%
• 6M: 2.45%
• 1Y: 21.29%
• 3Y*: 23.03%
• 5Y*: 14.58%
• 10Y*: 19.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGMIX vs. IRLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IGMIX VY Invesco Oppenheimer Global Portfolio	10.46%	24.34%	6.81%	32.60%	-31.74%	15.39%	27.76%	31.41%	-13.19%	36.49%
IRLNX Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio	3.68%	18.20%	34.60%	46.01%	-30.06%	30.63%	38.32%	35.61%	-2.02%	31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IGMIX and IRLNX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009	0.88

The correlation between IGMIX and IRLNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IGMIX vs. IRLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGMIX

IGMIX Risk / Return Rank: 50
IGMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
IGMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
IGMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
IGMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
IGMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

IRLNX

IRLNX Risk / Return Rank: 25
IRLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
IRLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
IRLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
IRLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
IRLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGMIX vs. IRLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VY Invesco Oppenheimer Global Portfolio (IGMIX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IGMIX	IRLNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.44	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	2.05	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.25	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	1.47	+1.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.19	4.55	+6.64

IGMIX vs. IRLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the IRLNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGMIX and IRLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IGMIX vs. IRLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGMIX drawdown since its inception was -54.68%, which is greater than IRLNX's maximum drawdown of -32.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGMIX and IRLNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGMIX	IRLNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.68%	-32.90%	-21.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.33%	-16.64%	+5.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.93%	-23.31%	-3.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.51%	-32.90%	-8.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.51%	-32.90%	-8.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-5.56%	+4.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.87%	-4.74%	-9.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	5.13%	-2.30%

Volatility

IGMIX vs. IRLNX - Volatility Comparison

VY Invesco Oppenheimer Global Portfolio (IGMIX) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) at 5.94%. This indicates that IGMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGMIX	IRLNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.40%	5.94%	+1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.79%	13.35%	+1.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.20%	17.08%	+1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.32%	22.12%	+1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.92%	21.52%	+0.40%

IGMIX vs. IRLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGMIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IRLNX's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGMIX vs. IRLNX - Dividend Comparison

IGMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.79%, more than IRLNX's 19.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGMIX VY Invesco Oppenheimer Global Portfolio	23.79%	7.32%	101.91%	11.19%	19.30%	4.38%	3.99%	18.95%	10.27%	1.11%	8.51%	9.89%
IRLNX Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio	19.92%	9.54%	3.55%	4.60%	11.22%	0.83%	4.18%	4.95%	3.70%	0.99%	1.23%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGMIX and IRLNX in my portfolio?

IGMIX and IRLNX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGMIX or IRLNX?

IGMIX has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to IRLNX (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGMIX dropped -54.68% vs IRLNX's -32.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.