PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGMIX vs. GQFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGMIX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VY Invesco Oppenheimer Global Portfolio (IGMIX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGMIX achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly higher than GQFPX's 8.80% return.


IGMIX

1D
0.60%
1M
6.25%
YTD
10.13%
6M
10.44%
1Y
29.49%
3Y*
17.14%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
12.33%

GQFPX

1D
0.53%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
8.80%
6M
9.02%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGMIX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IGMIX
VY Invesco Oppenheimer Global Portfolio
10.13%24.34%6.81%32.60%-31.74%3.39%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
8.80%19.29%4.81%15.09%-1.13%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IGMIX and GQFPX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between IGMIX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGMIX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGMIX
IGMIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IGMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IGMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

GQFPX
GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGMIX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VY Invesco Oppenheimer Global Portfolio (IGMIX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGMIXGQFPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

1.66

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.78

2.35

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.29

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

2.99

+1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.33

8.58

+9.75

IGMIX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGMIX and GQFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGMIXGQFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.66

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.82

-0.50

Drawdowns

IGMIX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGMIX drawdown since its inception was -54.68%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGMIX and GQFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGMIXGQFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.68%

-16.95%

-37.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-5.24%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.93%

-10.57%

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.93%

+3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.89%

-3.00%

-10.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

1.82%

+0.88%

Volatility

IGMIX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

VY Invesco Oppenheimer Global Portfolio (IGMIX) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.24%. This indicates that IGMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGMIXGQFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

3.24%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

7.63%

+5.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.93%

9.47%

+7.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.13%

12.82%

+10.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.84%

12.82%

+9.02%

IGMIX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGMIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGMIX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

IGMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.86%, more than GQFPX's 5.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
5.87%5.32%3.71%3.69%5.18%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGMIX
VY Invesco Oppenheimer Global Portfolio
23.86%7.32%101.91%11.19%19.30%4.38%3.99%18.95%10.27%1.11%8.51%9.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGMIX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGMIX has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to GQFPX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGMIX dropped -54.68% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.

IGMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGMIX and GQFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer