IGLN.L vs. EIMI.L
IGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while EIMI.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGLN.L returned 13.42%/yr vs 10.26%/yr for EIMI.L. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGLN.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EIMI.L.
Performance
IGLN.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLN.L achieves a 3.70% return, which is significantly lower than EIMI.L's 24.25% return. Over the past 10 years, IGLN.L has outperformed EIMI.L with an annualized return of 13.42%, while EIMI.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.26% annualized return.
IGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 3.70%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- 1Y
- 32.37%
- 3Y*
- 31.55%
- 5Y*
- 18.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
EIMI.L
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 24.25%
- 6M
- 27.21%
- 1Y
- 49.41%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
IGLN.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 3.70% | 64.92% | 26.14% | 13.44% | -0.09% | -4.03% | 24.16% | 18.28% | -1.31% | 11.67% |
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 24.25% | 32.16% | 7.36% | 11.03% | -19.67% | -0.65% | 18.80% | 16.37% | -14.17% | 36.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLN.L and EIMI.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2014 | 0.18 |
Over the past year, IGLN.L and EIMI.L have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLN.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGLN.L
EIMI.L
IGLN.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLN.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.47 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 3.88 | -2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.79 | 14.02 | -9.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLN.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 2.56 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 0.42 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.54 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.36 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
IGLN.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -45.24%, which is greater than EIMI.L's maximum drawdown of -38.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLN.L and EIMI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLN.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.24% | -38.73% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.36% | -12.66% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.36% | -17.44% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.15% | -35.50% | +14.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.15% | -38.73% | +17.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.66% | -2.64% | -13.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.80% | -14.04% | -5.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.74% | 3.52% | +3.22% |
Volatility
IGLN.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) is 6.36%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that IGLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLN.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.36% | 8.18% | -1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.73% | 16.71% | +5.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.78% | 19.23% | +5.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 18.31% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 19.15% | -3.61% |
IGLN.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLN.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGLN.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGLN.L nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLN.L and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EIMI.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EIMI.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IGLN.L.
IGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while EIMI.L is Emerging Markets Equities. IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IGLN.L and 0.18% for EIMI.L.
Find the right allocation for IGLN.L and EIMI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer