EIMI.L vs. VFEG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L).
EIMI.L and VFEG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EIMI.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on May 30, 2014. VFEG.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2019. Both EIMI.L and VFEG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EIMI.L or VFEG.L.
Performance
EIMI.L vs. VFEG.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIMI.L achieves a 7.74% return, which is significantly lower than VFEG.L's 12.53% return.
EIMI.L
7.74%
-6.39%
-1.10%
12.92%
3.79%
3.50%
VFEG.L
12.53%
-2.16%
1.75%
14.45%
4.15%
N/A
Key characteristics
| EIMI.L | VFEG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.87 | 1.10 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.34 | 1.65 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.16 | 1.20 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.50 | 0.72 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.38 | 5.59 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.95% | 2.48% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.94% | 12.73% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.73% | -25.35% |
| Current Drawdown | -14.80% | -4.78% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIMI.L vs. VFEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIMI.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than VFEG.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between EIMI.L and VFEG.L is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EIMI.L vs. VFEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EIMI.L vs. VFEG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EIMI.L nor VFEG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EIMI.L vs. VFEG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIMI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.73%, which is greater than VFEG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIMI.L and VFEG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EIMI.L vs. VFEG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) have volatilities of 4.86% and 5.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.