IGLN.L vs. SGLN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L).
IGLN.L and SGLN.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. SGLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. Both IGLN.L and SGLN.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IGLN.L or SGLN.L.
Correlation
The correlation between IGLN.L and SGLN.L is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IGLN.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IGLN.L:
3.18
SGLN.L:
3.25
IGLN.L:
3.93
SGLN.L:
4.30
IGLN.L:
1.54
SGLN.L:
1.58
IGLN.L:
5.72
SGLN.L:
7.39
IGLN.L:
15.47
SGLN.L:
17.14
IGLN.L:
2.94%
SGLN.L:
2.66%
IGLN.L:
14.26%
SGLN.L:
13.97%
IGLN.L:
-45.24%
SGLN.L:
-41.71%
IGLN.L:
0.00%
SGLN.L:
-0.70%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLN.L achieves a 12.83% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's 11.91% return. Over the past 10 years, IGLN.L has underperformed SGLN.L with an annualized return of 9.15%, while SGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.
IGLN.L
12.83%
7.38%
18.85%
45.28%
12.26%
9.15%
SGLN.L
11.91%
4.72%
23.04%
45.13%
12.84%
11.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGLN.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IGLN.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IGLN.L
SGLN.L
IGLN.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IGLN.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGLN.L nor SGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IGLN.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -45.24%, which is greater than SGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -41.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLN.L and SGLN.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IGLN.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.