EIMI.L vs. VWO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO).
EIMI.L and VWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EIMI.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on May 30, 2014. VWO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Emerging Index. It was launched on Mar 4, 2005. Both EIMI.L and VWO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EIMI.L or VWO.
Key characteristics
| EIMI.L | VWO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.48% | 5.98% |
| 1Y Return | 6.98% | 6.27% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.44% | -2.70% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.80% | 3.47% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.51% | 2.51% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.47 | 0.54 |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.42% | 13.22% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.73% | -67.68% |
| Current Drawdown | -15.79% | -14.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIMI.L and VWO is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EIMI.L vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EIMI.L achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 5.98% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: EIMI.L at 2.51% and VWO at 2.51%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIMI.L vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIMI.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EIMI.L vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EIMI.L vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
EIMI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 3.23% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.86% | 2.73% |
Drawdowns
EIMI.L vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIMI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.73%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIMI.L and VWO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EIMI.L vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) is 3.27%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that EIMI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.