EIMI.L vs. VFEA.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEA.DE).
EIMI.L and VFEA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EIMI.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on May 30, 2014. VFEA.DE is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Emerging. It was launched on Sep 24, 2019. Both EIMI.L and VFEA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EIMI.L vs. VFEA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIMI.L vs. VFEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 4.48% | 32.16% | 7.36% | 11.03% | -19.67% | -0.65% | 18.80% | 11.52% |
VFEA.DE Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc | 0.84% | 25.59% | 12.47% | 6.57% | -15.62% | -2.05% | 13.57% | 12.62% |
Different Trading Currencies
EIMI.L is traded in USD, while VFEA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VFEA.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIMI.L achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly higher than VFEA.DE's 0.84% return.
EIMI.L
- 1D
- 4.13%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- 4.48%
- 6M
- 8.17%
- 1Y
- 33.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
VFEA.DE
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 23.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIMI.L vs. VFEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIMI.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than VFEA.DE's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
EIMI.L vs. VFEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EIMI.L
VFEA.DE
EIMI.L vs. VFEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIMI.L | VFEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 1.30 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 1.80 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.25 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.10 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.80 | 7.55 | +2.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIMI.L | VFEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.30 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.21 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.38 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIMI.L and VFEA.DE is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EIMI.L vs. VFEA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EIMI.L nor VFEA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EIMI.L vs. VFEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIMI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.73%, which is greater than VFEA.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIMI.L and VFEA.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIMI.L | VFEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.73% | -30.51% | -8.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.66% | -13.34% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.66% | -19.99% | -15.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -5.89% | -3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.21% | -8.77% | -5.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 2.76% | +0.71% |
Volatility
EIMI.L vs. VFEA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a higher volatility of 8.48% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEA.DE) at 6.28%. This indicates that EIMI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIMI.L | VFEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.48% | 6.28% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.79% | 11.61% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.87% | 17.72% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 17.31% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 19.56% | -0.66% |