IGLN.L vs. XSFN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L).
IGLN.L and XSFN.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. XSFN.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017. Both IGLN.L and XSFN.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IGLN.L or XSFN.L.
Correlation
The correlation between IGLN.L and XSFN.L is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
IGLN.L vs. XSFN.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IGLN.L:
3.08
XSFN.L:
2.12
IGLN.L:
3.82
XSFN.L:
3.31
IGLN.L:
1.53
XSFN.L:
1.41
IGLN.L:
5.53
XSFN.L:
4.93
IGLN.L:
14.96
XSFN.L:
13.39
IGLN.L:
2.94%
XSFN.L:
2.30%
IGLN.L:
14.26%
XSFN.L:
14.53%
IGLN.L:
-45.24%
XSFN.L:
-36.54%
IGLN.L:
-0.27%
XSFN.L:
-3.16%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLN.L achieves a 12.53% return, which is significantly higher than XSFN.L's 5.19% return.
IGLN.L
12.53%
6.48%
16.65%
45.17%
12.19%
9.18%
XSFN.L
5.19%
-0.83%
22.97%
31.33%
13.58%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGLN.L vs. XSFN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLN.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XSFN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IGLN.L vs. XSFN.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IGLN.L
XSFN.L
IGLN.L vs. XSFN.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IGLN.L vs. XSFN.L - Dividend Comparison
IGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSFN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSFN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D | 1.11% | 1.10% | 1.67% | 2.55% | 1.31% | 1.32% | 3.53% |
Drawdowns
IGLN.L vs. XSFN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -45.24%, which is greater than XSFN.L's maximum drawdown of -36.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLN.L and XSFN.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IGLN.L vs. XSFN.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) have volatilities of 3.35% and 3.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.