PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGIB vs. MBBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGIB vs. MBBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) and VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGIB achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than MBBB's 0.43% return.


IGIB

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.14%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
6.21%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
3.04%

MBBB

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.32%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGIB vs. MBBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IGIB
iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.21%9.58%3.49%9.22%-14.00%-1.66%0.87%
MBBB
VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF
0.43%7.64%3.68%9.75%-15.04%0.30%1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between IGIB and MBBB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020

0.97

The correlation between IGIB and MBBB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGIB vs. MBBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGIB
IGIB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IGIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGIB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IGIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGIB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

MBBB
MBBB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGIB vs. MBBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) and VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGIBMBBBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

1.82

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.08

5.86

+1.22

IGIB vs. MBBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGIB Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the MBBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGIB and MBBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGIBMBBBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.31

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.18

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.18

+0.51

Drawdowns

IGIB vs. MBBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGIB drawdown since its inception was -20.62%, smaller than the maximum MBBB drawdown of -21.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGIB and MBBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGIBMBBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.62%

-21.73%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.01%

-2.98%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.05%

-5.64%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.62%

-21.73%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-0.97%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-6.83%

+4.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.92%

-0.03%

Volatility

IGIB vs. MBBB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) is 1.33%, while VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) has a volatility of 1.52%. This indicates that IGIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGIBMBBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

1.52%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

3.15%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

4.14%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.56%

6.36%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

6.23%

-0.17%

IGIB vs. MBBB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGIB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than MBBB's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGIB vs. MBBB - Dividend Comparison

IGIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, less than MBBB's 5.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGIB
iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.82%4.59%4.41%3.78%3.04%2.52%2.74%3.44%3.41%2.51%2.45%2.51%
MBBB
VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF
5.08%4.99%4.93%4.51%3.22%2.29%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, IGIB and MBBB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MBBB has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to IGIB (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGIB dropped -20.62% vs MBBB's -21.73%.

On 5-year performance, IGIB leads with 1.37% vs 1.11% for MBBB. On fees, IGIB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IGIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IGIB has performed better with a 1.37% return vs 1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGIB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MBBB.

MBBB has the higher dividend yield at 5.08%, compared with 4.82% for IGIB.

IGIB tracks Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Intermediate Credit Index, while MBBB tracks MVIS Moody's Analytics US BBB Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IGIB and 0.25% for MBBB.

IGIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGIB and MBBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer