IGIB vs. IGSB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) and iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB).
IGIB and IGSB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGIB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Intermediate Credit Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. IGSB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE BofAML 1-5 Year US Corporate Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. Both IGIB and IGSB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IGIB or IGSB.
Key characteristics
| IGIB | IGSB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.02% | 0.16% |
| 1Y Return | 2.18% | 3.99% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.37% | 0.05% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.37% | 1.83% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.12% | 1.75% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.45 | 1.44 |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.96% | 3.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.62% | -13.38% |
| Current Drawdown | -9.77% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGIB and IGSB is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IGIB vs. IGSB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IGIB achieves a -2.02% return, which is significantly lower than IGSB's 0.16% return. Over the past 10 years, IGIB has outperformed IGSB with an annualized return of 2.12%, while IGSB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.75% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGIB vs. IGSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IGIB and IGSB have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IGIB vs. IGSB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) and iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IGIB vs. IGSB - Dividend Comparison
IGIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than IGSB's 3.58% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGIB iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.13% | 3.78% | 3.04% | 2.52% | 2.74% | 3.44% | 3.41% | 2.51% | 2.45% | 2.51% | 2.46% | 2.72% |
IGSB iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 3.58% | 3.26% | 2.06% | 1.82% | 2.36% | 3.06% | 2.46% | 1.65% | 1.45% | 1.18% | 0.94% | 1.17% |
Drawdowns
IGIB vs. IGSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGIB drawdown since its inception was -20.62%, which is greater than IGSB's maximum drawdown of -13.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGIB and IGSB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IGIB vs. IGSB - Volatility Comparison
iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) has a higher volatility of 1.86% compared to iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB) at 0.79%. This indicates that IGIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.