IGIB vs. LQD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD).
IGIB and LQD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGIB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Intermediate Credit Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. LQD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. It was launched on Jul 26, 2002. Both IGIB and LQD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IGIB or LQD.
Correlation
The correlation between IGIB and LQD is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IGIB vs. LQD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IGIB:
0.98
LQD:
0.36
IGIB:
1.42
LQD:
0.55
IGIB:
1.17
LQD:
1.06
IGIB:
0.50
LQD:
0.16
IGIB:
3.60
LQD:
1.09
IGIB:
1.45%
LQD:
2.32%
IGIB:
5.34%
LQD:
7.00%
IGIB:
-20.63%
LQD:
-24.95%
IGIB:
-3.77%
LQD:
-9.81%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGIB achieves a 4.50% return, which is significantly higher than LQD's 2.41% return. Over the past 10 years, IGIB has outperformed LQD with an annualized return of 2.65%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively lower 2.46% annualized return.
IGIB
4.50%
0.97%
3.78%
5.33%
1.21%
2.65%
LQD
2.41%
0.90%
3.02%
2.69%
0.09%
2.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGIB vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGIB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IGIB vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IGIB vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison
IGIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, which matches LQD's 4.01% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGIB iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 3.97% | 3.78% | 3.04% | 2.52% | 2.74% | 3.44% | 3.41% | 2.51% | 2.45% | 2.51% | 2.46% | 2.72% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.01% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% | 3.39% | 3.83% |
Drawdowns
IGIB vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGIB drawdown since its inception was -20.63%, smaller than the maximum LQD drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGIB and LQD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IGIB vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) is 1.34%, while iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a volatility of 1.91%. This indicates that IGIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.