IGGY vs. EFAS
IGGY (AB International Growth ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGGY is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while EFAS is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. IGGY is actively managed, while EFAS is passively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.
Performance
IGGY vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGGY achieves a -1.73% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 16.36% return.
IGGY
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- -1.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFAS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- YTD
- 16.36%
- 1Y
- 28.83%
- 3Y*
- 23.84%
- 5Y*
- 13.62%
- 10Y*
- —
IGGY vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IGGY AB International Growth ETF | -1.73% | -3.42% |
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 16.36% | 2.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGGY and EFAS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGGY vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank
IGGY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EFAS
IGGY vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB International Growth ETF (IGGY) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGGY | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGGY vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGGY drawdown since its inception was -19.69%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGGY and EFAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGGY | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.69% | -44.38% | +24.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.86% | -0.14% | -7.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -7.02% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.16% | — |
Volatility
IGGY vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGGY | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.00% | 10.91% | +9.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 15.57% | +4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 18.26% | +1.74% |
IGGY vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IGGY and EFAS have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Dividends
IGGY vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison
IGGY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 4.69% | 4.83% | 6.76% | 6.33% | 7.28% | 5.19% | 4.34% | 5.75% | 6.63% | 6.15% | 0.21% |
IGGY AB International Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGGY and EFAS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGGY and EFAS have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.
EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 0.00% for IGGY.
IGGY is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EFAS is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Global X.
Find the right allocation for IGGY and EFAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer