IGF vs. TRFK

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) and TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGF returned 15.43%/yr vs 49.48%/yr for TRFK. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TRFK.

Performance

IGF vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than TRFK's 54.84% return.

IGF

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: 7.07%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 13.89%
• 3Y*: 15.43%
• 5Y*: 9.75%
• 10Y*: 8.26%

TRFK

• 1D: 3.16%
• 1M: 10.52%
• YTD: 54.84%
• 6M: 45.80%
• 1Y: 84.85%
• 3Y*: 49.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGF vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	7.07%	21.31%	14.81%	6.14%	-5.69%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	54.84%	26.81%	38.30%	66.63%	-10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IGF and TRFK is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2022	0.38

The correlation between IGF and TRFK shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IGF vs. TRFK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGF	TRFK
Utilities	41.1%	-
Industrials	38.8%	8.3%
Energy	20.1%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	91.8%

Return for Risk

IGF vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 45
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 40
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 47

TRFK

TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 81
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 83
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGF vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IGF	TRFK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	2.89	-1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	3.36	-1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.45	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	4.36	-1.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.08	10.40	-3.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGF vs. TRFK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGF Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the TRFK Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGF and TRFK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IGF	TRFK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	2.89	-1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	1.44	-1.20

Drawdowns

IGF vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than TRFK's maximum drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and TRFK.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGF	TRFK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.33%	-29.06%	-29.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.87%	-19.56%	+13.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.28%	-29.06%	+14.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.29%	-8.94%	+3.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.87%	-6.05%	-5.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	8.19%	-6.22%

Volatility

IGF vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) is 3.61%, while Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a volatility of 14.91%. This indicates that IGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGF	TRFK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	14.91%	-11.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	24.23%	-15.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.56%	29.53%	-18.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.00%	29.31%	-15.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	29.31%	-12.47%

IGF vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TRFK's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGF vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison

IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than TRFK's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	3.01%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.40%	0.20%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGF and TRFK in my portfolio?

IGF and TRFK have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGF or TRFK?

TRFK has higher volatility (14.91%) compared to IGF (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGF dropped -58.33% vs TRFK's -29.06%.

Which ETF is better, IGF or TRFK?

On 3-year performance, TRFK leads with 49.48% vs 15.43% for IGF. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGF or TRFK?

Over the 3-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 49.48% return vs 15.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGF or TRFK?

IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TRFK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGF or TRFK?

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.

What is the main difference between IGF and TRFK?

IGF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while TRFK is Technology Equities. IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGF and 0.60% for TRFK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRFK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.