PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IGF vs. TRFK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IGF vs. TRFK

Last updated Jul 21, 2026
Documentation

IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) and TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net), while TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGF returned 15.34%/yr vs 41.91%/yr for TRFK. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TRFK.

Performance

IGF vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than TRFK's 41.76% return.

IGF

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.44%
6M
8.59%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
16.18%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
8.09%
ALL TIME*
4.91%

TRFK

1D
0.61%
1M
-16.90%
6M
38.73%
YTD
41.76%
1Y
48.18%
3Y*
41.91%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
37.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGF vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF		10.15%21.31%14.81%6.14%-8.04%
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF		41.76%26.81%38.30%66.63%-10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IGF and TRFK is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022

0.37

The correlation between IGF and TRFK shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IGF vs. TRFK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IGF
TRFK

Utilities

40.2%

-

Industrials

39.9%
12.0%

Energy

19.9%

-

Real Estate

0.1%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.9%

Communication Services

-

0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

87.4%

Utilities

IGF
40.2%
TRFK

-

Industrials

IGF
39.9%
TRFK
12.0%

Energy

IGF
19.9%
TRFK

-

Real Estate

IGF
0.1%
TRFK
0.0%

Basic Materials

IGF

-

TRFK
0.9%

Communication Services

IGF

-

TRFK
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IGF

-

TRFK

-

Consumer Defensive

IGF

-

TRFK

-

Financial Services

IGF

-

TRFK

-

Healthcare

IGF

-

TRFK

-

Technology

IGF

-

TRFK
87.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF

Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF

Often compared with IGF:
IGF vs. IFRAIGF vs. GIIIGF vs. NFRAIGF vs. SPYIGF vs. GLIFXIGF vs. VPUIGF vs. XLU
Often compared with TRFK:
TRFK vs. FDTXTRFK vs. DTCRTRFK vs. IDGTTRFK vs. FRATRFK vs. PRNTRFK vs. SPYGTRFK vs. VRGWX

Return for Risk

IGF vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IGF
IGF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
TRFK
TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGF vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IGFTRFKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.53
1.39

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.20
1.87

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.48

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.55

5.41

+2.14

IGF vs. TRFK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGF Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the TRFK Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGF and TRFK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGF vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than TRFK's maximum drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and TRFK.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IGFTRFKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.33%

-29.06%

-29.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.87%

-19.56%

+13.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.28%

-29.06%

+14.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.83%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.11%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-18.31%

+15.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.81%

-6.13%

-5.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

8.93%

-6.78%

Volatility

IGF vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) is 2.85%, while Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a volatility of 17.12%. This indicates that IGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IGFTRFKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

17.12%

-14.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.93%

30.06%

-21.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

34.92%

-24.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.93%

30.45%

-16.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

30.45%

-13.74%

IGF vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TRFK's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGF vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison

IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than TRFK's 0.01% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF		2.89%3.23%3.21%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.98%3.25%
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF		0.01%0.01%0.40%0.20%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IGF and TRFK have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRFK has higher volatility (17.12%) compared to IGF (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGF dropped -58.33% vs TRFK's -29.06%.

On 3-year performance, TRFK leads with 41.91% vs 15.34% for IGF. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 41.91% return vs 15.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TRFK.

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.

IGF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while TRFK is Technology Equities. IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net), while TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGF and 0.60% for TRFK.

IGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGF and TRFK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer