IGF vs. ROKT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT).
IGF and ROKT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2007. ROKT is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2018. Both IGF and ROKT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IGF vs. ROKT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IGF vs. ROKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.19% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 6.14% | -1.26% | 11.57% | -6.50% | 25.82% | -2.41% |
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 16.96% | 50.56% | 27.89% | 14.41% | -0.81% | 4.63% | 7.99% | 40.90% | -13.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly lower than ROKT's 16.96% return.
IGF
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 11.40%
- 1Y
- 26.64%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
ROKT
- 1D
- 4.44%
- 1M
- -4.02%
- YTD
- 16.96%
- 6M
- 30.61%
- 1Y
- 87.29%
- 3Y*
- 35.37%
- 5Y*
- 20.32%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGF vs. ROKT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ROKT's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IGF vs. ROKT — Risk / Return Rank
IGF
ROKT
IGF vs. ROKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGF | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 3.00 | -0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.77 | 3.66 | -0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.50 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 6.48 | -3.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.62 | 24.82 | -9.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGF | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 3.00 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.93 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.75 | -0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between IGF and ROKT is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IGF vs. ROKT - Dividend Comparison
IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than ROKT's 0.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.95% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 0.34% | 0.41% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 1.79% | 0.48% | 0.74% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IGF vs. ROKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than ROKT's maximum drawdown of -43.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and ROKT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGF | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.33% | -43.16% | -15.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -13.36% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.83% | -23.46% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -7.46% | +4.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.96% | -6.86% | -5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 3.49% | -1.75% |
Volatility
IGF vs. ROKT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) is 4.25%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a volatility of 10.58%. This indicates that IGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IGF | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 10.58% | -6.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.33% | 22.67% | -15.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 29.22% | -16.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 21.87% | -7.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 24.78% | -7.97% |