IGF vs. MLPB
IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) and MLPB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B) are both Infrastructure Equities funds - IGF tracks the S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net) while MLPB tracks the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGF returned 8.14%/yr vs 8.89%/yr for MLPB. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IGF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MLPB.
Performance
IGF vs. MLPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than MLPB's 26.62% return. Over the past 10 years, IGF has underperformed MLPB with an annualized return of 8.14%, while MLPB has yielded a comparatively higher 8.89% annualized return.
IGF
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- 16.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.91%
MLPB
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 7.18%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- YTD
- 26.62%
- 1Y
- 25.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.81%
- 5Y*
- 22.18%
- 10Y*
- 8.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $38.15M | $37.64M | $47.97M | |
| $90.23K | $111.55K | $133.00K |
IGF vs. MLPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 10.41% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 6.14% | -1.26% | 11.57% | -6.50% | 25.82% | -9.95% | 19.31% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 26.62% | 7.40% | 25.53% | 22.01% | 30.22% | 39.42% | -30.80% | 5.69% | -8.79% | -9.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGF and MLPB is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2015 | 0.42 |
The correlation between IGF and MLPB shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGF vs. MLPB — Risk / Return Rank
IGF
MLPB
IGF vs. MLPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGF | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 2.56 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.59 | 6.82 | +0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGF vs. MLPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, smaller than the maximum MLPB drawdown of -71.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and MLPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGF | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.33% | -71.93% | +13.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.87% | -9.28% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.31% | -16.49% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.83% | -20.41% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.11% | -71.93% | +29.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | 0.00% | -2.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.79% | -14.67% | +2.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 3.72% | -1.53% |
Volatility
IGF vs. MLPB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) is 2.75%, while ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that IGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGF | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 4.65% | -1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.92% | 11.14% | -2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.69% | 14.17% | -3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 19.62% | -5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 27.20% | -10.49% |
IGF vs. MLPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGF vs. MLPB - Dividend Comparison
IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than MLPB's 5.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.89% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 5.70% | 6.51% | 5.95% | 6.37% | 6.00% | 6.98% | 11.93% | 7.98% | 8.11% | 7.23% | 6.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGF and MLPB have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPB has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to IGF (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGF dropped -58.33% vs MLPB's -71.93%.
On 10-year performance, MLPB leads with 8.89% vs 8.14% for IGF. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MLPB has performed better with a 8.89% return vs 8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MLPB.
MLPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 2.89% for IGF.
IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net), while MLPB tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGF and 0.85% for MLPB.
MLPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGF and MLPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer