IFRA vs. VIS
IFRA (iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF) and VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - IFRA tracks the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index while VIS tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IFRA returned 13.03%/yr vs 12.60%/yr for VIS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IFRA charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VIS.
Performance
IFRA vs. VIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFRA achieves a 16.86% return, which is significantly higher than VIS's 14.63% return.
IFRA
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 28.44%
- 3Y*
- 20.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- —
VIS
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 14.63%
- 6M
- 15.23%
- 1Y
- 26.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.60%
- 10Y*
- 14.06%
IFRA vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 16.86% | 15.90% | 17.02% | 13.42% | -3.32% | 29.81% | 7.37% | 27.00% | -8.57% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 14.63% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 20.80% | 12.34% | 30.09% | -13.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFRA and VIS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IFRA and VIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
IFRA vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFRA
VIS
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Industrials
IFRA
VIS
Utilities
IFRA
VIS
Basic Materials
IFRA
VIS
Energy
IFRA
VIS
Consumer Cyclical
IFRA
VIS
Consumer Defensive
IFRA
VIS
-
Communication Services
IFRA
-
VIS
Financial Services
IFRA
-
VIS
Healthcare
IFRA
-
VIS
Real Estate
IFRA
-
VIS
Technology
IFRA
-
VIS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFRA vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank
IFRA
VIS
IFRA vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IFRA | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.28 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 2.18 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.70 | 9.06 | +3.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFRA | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.64 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.69 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.52 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
IFRA vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFRA drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, smaller than the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFRA and VIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFRA | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.06% | -63.51% | +22.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.40% | -12.29% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.93% | -20.80% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.93% | -22.96% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -1.22% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -8.38% | +3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 2.96% | -0.71% |
Volatility
IFRA vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) is 4.89%, while Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that IFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFRA | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 5.15% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 13.47% | -2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.79% | 16.42% | -1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 18.35% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 20.43% | +0.95% |
IFRA vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFRA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VIS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFRA vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison
IFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than VIS's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.59% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.89% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFRA and VIS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIS has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to IFRA (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFRA dropped -41.06% vs VIS's -63.51%.
On 5-year performance, IFRA leads with 13.03% vs 12.60% for VIS. On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IFRA has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IFRA has performed better with a 13.03% return vs 12.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IFRA.
IFRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.89% for VIS.
IFRA tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index, while VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IFRA and 0.10% for VIS.
IFRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFRA and VIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer