PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFRA vs. KARS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFRA vs. KARS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IFRA having a 16.86% return and KARS slightly lower at 16.24%.


IFRA

1D
0.20%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
16.86%
6M
16.28%
1Y
28.44%
3Y*
20.10%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*

KARS

1D
-3.32%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
16.24%
6M
17.45%
1Y
69.84%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
-2.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFRA vs. KARS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IFRA
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
16.86%15.90%17.02%13.42%-3.32%29.81%7.37%27.00%-8.57%
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
16.24%46.04%-17.88%-7.85%-39.20%24.11%71.17%34.66%-23.41%

Correlation

The correlation between IFRA and KARS is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018

0.53

The correlation between IFRA and KARS shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IFRA vs. KARS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IFRA
KARS

Industrials

39.4%
21.9%

Utilities

37.7%

-

Basic Materials

14.7%
26.6%

Energy

7.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
34.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

17.2%

Industrials

IFRA
39.4%
KARS
21.9%

Utilities

IFRA
37.7%
KARS

-

Basic Materials

IFRA
14.7%
KARS
26.6%

Energy

IFRA
7.9%
KARS

-

Consumer Cyclical

IFRA
0.0%
KARS
34.3%

Consumer Defensive

IFRA
0.0%
KARS

-

Communication Services

IFRA

-

KARS

-

Financial Services

IFRA

-

KARS

-

Healthcare

IFRA

-

KARS

-

Real Estate

IFRA

-

KARS

-

Technology

IFRA

-

KARS
17.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFRA vs. KARS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFRA
IFRA Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

KARS
KARS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
KARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
KARS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
KARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
KARS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFRA vs. KARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IFRAKARSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.43

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

6.97

-3.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.70

19.68

-6.98

IFRA vs. KARS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the KARS Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFRA and KARS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFRAKARSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.71

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

-0.08

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.20

+0.44

Drawdowns

IFRA vs. KARS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFRA drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, smaller than the maximum KARS drawdown of -64.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFRA and KARS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFRAKARSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.06%

-64.85%

+23.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-10.08%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.93%

-47.79%

+27.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.93%

-64.85%

+44.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-29.15%

+26.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-28.32%

+23.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

3.56%

-1.31%

Volatility

IFRA vs. KARS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) is 4.89%, while KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that IFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KARS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFRAKARSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

9.00%

-4.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.32%

18.66%

-7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.79%

25.97%

-11.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.92%

29.78%

-11.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.38%

29.29%

-7.91%

IFRA vs. KARS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFRA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than KARS's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFRA vs. KARS - Dividend Comparison

IFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than KARS's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IFRA
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
1.59%1.84%1.75%1.98%1.98%1.63%2.08%1.68%2.50%
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
0.16%0.18%0.78%0.88%1.13%6.73%0.14%1.85%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFRA and KARS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KARS has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to IFRA (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFRA dropped -41.06% vs KARS's -64.85%.

On 5-year performance, IFRA leads with 13.03% vs -2.35% for KARS. On fees, IFRA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IFRA has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IFRA has performed better with a 13.03% return vs -2.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFRA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.

IFRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.16% for KARS.

IFRA tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index, while KARS tracks Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IFRA and 0.72% for KARS.

KARS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFRA and KARS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer