IFRA vs. KARS
IFRA (iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF) and KARS (KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - IFRA tracks the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index while KARS tracks the Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IFRA returned 13.03%/yr vs -2.35%/yr for KARS. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFRA charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for KARS.
Performance
IFRA vs. KARS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IFRA having a 16.86% return and KARS slightly lower at 16.24%.
IFRA
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 28.44%
- 3Y*
- 20.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- —
KARS
- 1D
- -3.32%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- YTD
- 16.24%
- 6M
- 17.45%
- 1Y
- 69.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- -2.35%
- 10Y*
- —
IFRA vs. KARS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 16.86% | 15.90% | 17.02% | 13.42% | -3.32% | 29.81% | 7.37% | 27.00% | -8.57% |
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | 16.24% | 46.04% | -17.88% | -7.85% | -39.20% | 24.11% | 71.17% | 34.66% | -23.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFRA and KARS is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018 | 0.53 |
The correlation between IFRA and KARS shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IFRA vs. KARS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFRA
KARS
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Industrials
IFRA
KARS
Utilities
IFRA
KARS
-
Basic Materials
IFRA
KARS
Energy
IFRA
KARS
-
Consumer Cyclical
IFRA
KARS
Consumer Defensive
IFRA
KARS
-
Communication Services
IFRA
-
KARS
-
Financial Services
IFRA
-
KARS
-
Healthcare
IFRA
-
KARS
-
Real Estate
IFRA
-
KARS
-
Technology
IFRA
-
KARS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFRA vs. KARS — Risk / Return Rank
IFRA
KARS
IFRA vs. KARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IFRA | KARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.43 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 6.97 | -3.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.70 | 19.68 | -6.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFRA | KARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.71 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | -0.08 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.20 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
IFRA vs. KARS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFRA drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, smaller than the maximum KARS drawdown of -64.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFRA and KARS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFRA | KARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.06% | -64.85% | +23.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.40% | -10.08% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.93% | -47.79% | +27.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.93% | -64.85% | +44.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -29.15% | +26.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -28.32% | +23.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 3.56% | -1.31% |
Volatility
IFRA vs. KARS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) is 4.89%, while KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that IFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KARS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFRA | KARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 9.00% | -4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 18.66% | -7.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.79% | 25.97% | -11.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 29.78% | -11.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 29.29% | -7.91% |
IFRA vs. KARS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFRA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than KARS's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFRA vs. KARS - Dividend Comparison
IFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than KARS's 0.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.59% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 2.50% |
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | 0.16% | 0.18% | 0.78% | 0.88% | 1.13% | 6.73% | 0.14% | 1.85% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFRA and KARS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KARS has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to IFRA (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFRA dropped -41.06% vs KARS's -64.85%.
On 5-year performance, IFRA leads with 13.03% vs -2.35% for KARS. On fees, IFRA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IFRA has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IFRA has performed better with a 13.03% return vs -2.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFRA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.
IFRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.16% for KARS.
IFRA tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index, while KARS tracks Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IFRA and 0.72% for KARS.
KARS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFRA and KARS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer