IFRA vs. IXUS
IFRA (iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF) and IXUS (iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFRA is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index, while IXUS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IFRA returned 13.16%/yr vs 8.24%/yr for IXUS. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFRA charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IXUS.
Performance
IFRA vs. IXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFRA achieves a 18.48% return, which is significantly higher than IXUS's 13.86% return.
IFRA
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 18.48%
- 6M
- 17.32%
- 1Y
- 31.06%
- 3Y*
- 19.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- —
IXUS
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 13.86%
- 6M
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 30.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
IFRA vs. IXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 18.48% | 15.90% | 17.02% | 13.42% | -3.32% | 29.81% | 7.37% | 27.00% | -7.97% |
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | 13.86% | 32.40% | 5.19% | 15.83% | -16.47% | 8.86% | 10.80% | 21.71% | -13.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFRA and IXUS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.67 |
The correlation between IFRA and IXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
IFRA vs. IXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFRA
IXUS
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Industrials
IFRA
IXUS
Utilities
IFRA
IXUS
Basic Materials
IFRA
IXUS
Energy
IFRA
IXUS
Consumer Cyclical
IFRA
IXUS
Consumer Defensive
IFRA
IXUS
Communication Services
IFRA
-
IXUS
Financial Services
IFRA
-
IXUS
Healthcare
IFRA
-
IXUS
Real Estate
IFRA
-
IXUS
Technology
IFRA
-
IXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFRA vs. IXUS — Risk / Return Rank
IFRA
IXUS
IFRA vs. IXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFRA | IXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 2.51 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.99 | 9.67 | +3.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFRA vs. IXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFRA drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, which is greater than IXUS's maximum drawdown of -36.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFRA and IXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFRA | IXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.06% | -36.22% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.40% | -11.36% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.93% | -13.75% | -6.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.93% | -30.03% | +10.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -1.57% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -7.49% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 2.95% | -0.65% |
Volatility
IFRA vs. IXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) is 5.38%, while iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) has a volatility of 6.88%. This indicates that IFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFRA | IXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 6.88% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.69% | 14.23% | -2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.13% | 16.29% | -1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 16.38% | +1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.37% | 17.12% | +4.25% |
IFRA vs. IXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFRA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IXUS's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFRA vs. IXUS - Dividend Comparison
IFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than IXUS's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.57% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | 2.84% | 3.24% | 3.33% | 3.13% | 2.48% | 3.12% | 1.85% | 3.09% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 2.58% | 2.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFRA and IXUS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXUS has higher volatility (6.88%) compared to IFRA (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFRA dropped -41.06% vs IXUS's -36.22%.
On 5-year performance, IFRA leads with 13.16% vs 8.24% for IXUS. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IFRA has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IFRA has performed better with a 13.16% return vs 8.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IFRA.
IXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 1.57% for IFRA.
IFRA is categorized as Industrials Equities, while IXUS is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IFRA tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index, while IXUS tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IFRA and 0.07% for IXUS.
IFRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFRA and IXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer