IFLR vs. WBIF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IFLR (Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF) and WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for WBIF.

Performance

IFLR vs. WBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly lower than WBIF's 12.01% return.

IFLR

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 3.17%
• YTD: 5.48%
• 6M: 7.43%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WBIF

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: 12.01%
• 6M: 11.33%
• 1Y: 23.76%
• 3Y*: 9.09%
• 5Y*: 2.46%
• 10Y*: 5.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFLR vs. WBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF	5.48%	4.20%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	12.01%	3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between IFLR and WBIF is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	0.56

IFLR vs. WBIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IFLR	WBIF
Financial Services	21.1%	31.0%
Industrials	17.4%	14.6%
Technology	11.4%	19.9%
Healthcare	9.6%	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	11.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.6%	3.1%
Basic Materials	5.7%	1.0%
Communication Services	3.9%	2.6%
Energy	3.7%	2.9%
Utilities	3.6%	10.3%
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

IFLR vs. WBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBIF

WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 64
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 58
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFLR vs. WBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IFLR	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.51	0.31	+1.20

Drawdowns

IFLR vs. WBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum WBIF drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and WBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFLR	WBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.58%	-20.29%	+10.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.60%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.13%	-0.61%	-1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.75%	-7.73%	+4.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IFLR	WBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.63%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.03%	12.29%	+0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.03%	12.86%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.03%	12.34%	+0.69%

IFLR vs. WBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIF's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFLR vs. WBIF - Dividend Comparison

IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, more than WBIF's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	0.06%	0.14%	1.17%	0.82%	0.96%	2.59%	0.09%	1.04%	0.77%	0.75%	0.67%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IFLR and WBIF in my portfolio?

IFLR and WBIF have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IFLR or WBIF?

On fees, IFLR is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IFLR or WBIF?

IFLR is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IFLR or WBIF?

IFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.06% for WBIF.

What is the main difference between IFLR and WBIF?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 1.25% for WBIF.