IFLR vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IFLR (Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFLR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. IFLR is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.31, they often move in opposite directions. IFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

IFLR vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.67% return.

IFLR

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 3.17%
• YTD: 5.48%
• 6M: 7.43%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 2.67%
• 6M: 2.74%
• 1Y: 4.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFLR vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF	5.48%	4.20%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.67%	0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between IFLR and RBIL is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	-0.31

Return for Risk

IFLR vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 98
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFLR vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IFLR	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.51	4.24	-2.73

Drawdowns

IFLR vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFLR	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.58%	-0.50%	-9.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.13%	-0.03%	-2.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.75%	-0.06%	-2.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IFLR	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.30%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.03%	0.92%	+12.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.03%	1.05%	+11.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.03%	1.05%	+11.98%

IFLR vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFLR vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF	0.28%	0.00%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.60%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IFLR and RBIL in my portfolio?

IFLR and RBIL have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IFLR or RBIL?

On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IFLR or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for IFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IFLR or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.28% for IFLR.

What is the main difference between IFLR and RBIL?

IFLR is categorized as Global Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 0.17% for RBIL.