PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFLR vs. WRND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFLR vs. WRND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly lower than WRND's 17.02% return.


IFLR

1D
0.53%
1M
3.16%
YTD
5.50%
6M
8.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WRND

1D
0.15%
1M
5.70%
YTD
17.02%
6M
17.41%
1Y
40.98%
3Y*
22.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFLR vs. WRND - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IFLR and WRND is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

0.77

IFLR vs. WRND - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IFLR
WRND

Financial Services

21.1%

-

Industrials

17.4%
14.0%

Technology

11.4%
49.9%

Healthcare

9.6%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
1.6%

Basic Materials

5.7%
1.0%

Communication Services

3.9%
13.2%

Energy

3.7%

-

Utilities

3.6%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Financial Services

IFLR
21.1%
WRND

-

Industrials

IFLR
17.4%
WRND
14.0%

Technology

IFLR
11.4%
WRND
49.9%

Healthcare

IFLR
9.6%
WRND
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IFLR
7.3%
WRND
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

IFLR
6.6%
WRND
1.6%

Basic Materials

IFLR
5.7%
WRND
1.0%

Communication Services

IFLR
3.9%
WRND
13.2%

Energy

IFLR
3.7%
WRND

-

Utilities

IFLR
3.6%
WRND

-

Real Estate

IFLR
1.7%
WRND

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFLR vs. WRND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFLR

WRND
WRND Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
WRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRND Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
WRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRND Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFLR vs. WRND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IFLR vs. WRND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFLRWRNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

0.82

+0.71

Drawdowns

IFLR vs. WRND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum WRND drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and WRND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFLRWRNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-27.16%

+17.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

0.00%

-2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-5.98%

+3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

Volatility

IFLR vs. WRND - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFLRWRNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.09%

16.79%

-3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.09%

18.80%

-5.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.09%

18.80%

-5.71%

IFLR vs. WRND - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than WRND's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFLR vs. WRND - Dividend Comparison

IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than WRND's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IFLR
Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF
0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WRND
IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF
0.98%1.29%1.15%2.06%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFLR and WRND have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WRND is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WRND is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for IFLR.

WRND has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.28% for IFLR.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and IndexIQ. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 0.18% for WRND.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFLR and WRND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer