IFLR vs. WRND
IFLR (Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF) and WRND (IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF) are both Global Equities funds. IFLR is actively managed, while WRND is passively managed. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WRND.
Performance
IFLR vs. WRND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly lower than WRND's 12.55% return.
IFLR
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 7.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
WRND
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- 6M
- 7.58%
- YTD
- 12.55%
- 1Y
- 28.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $761.70K | $614.46K | $734.84K | |
| $60.47K | $31.46K | $21.89K |
IFLR vs. WRND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 7.58% | 3.03% |
WRND IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF | 12.55% | 3.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFLR and WRND is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.77 |
IFLR vs. WRND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFLR
WRND
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
IFLR
WRND
Industrials
IFLR
WRND
Technology
IFLR
WRND
Healthcare
IFLR
WRND
Consumer Cyclical
IFLR
WRND
Consumer Defensive
IFLR
WRND
Basic Materials
IFLR
WRND
Energy
IFLR
WRND
-
Utilities
IFLR
WRND
-
Communication Services
IFLR
WRND
Real Estate
IFLR
WRND
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFLR vs. WRND — Risk / Return Rank
IFLR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WRND
IFLR vs. WRND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFLR | WRND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFLR vs. WRND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum WRND drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and WRND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFLR | WRND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -27.16% | +17.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -3.82% | +3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.54% | -5.90% | +3.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility
IFLR vs. WRND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFLR | WRND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 18.93% | -5.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 19.02% | -5.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 19.02% | -5.85% |
IFLR vs. WRND - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than WRND's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFLR vs. WRND - Dividend Comparison
IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, which matches WRND's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WRND IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF | 0.93% | 1.29% | 1.15% | 2.06% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFLR and WRND have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WRND is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WRND is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for IFLR.
IFLR and WRND have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.93%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and IndexIQ. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 0.18% for WRND.
Find the right allocation for IFLR and WRND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer