IFED vs. FNGU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) and FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds - IFED tracks the IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross while FNGU tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IFED returned 1.97% vs 64.67% for FNGU. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFED charges 0.45%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for FNGU.

Performance

IFED vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFED achieves a -3.52% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 36.18% return.

IFED

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 4.85%
• YTD: -3.52%
• 6M: -3.51%
• 1Y: 1.97%
• 3Y*: 16.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNGU

• 1D: -3.75%
• 1M: 33.96%
• YTD: 36.18%
• 6M: 16.22%
• 1Y: 64.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFED vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN	-3.52%	5.99%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	36.18%	4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IFED and FNGU is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.56

The correlation between IFED and FNGU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IFED vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFED

IFED Risk / Return Rank: 10
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 10
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 10

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 27
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFED vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IFED	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	1.13	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.29	1.69	-1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.21	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.14	1.09	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.34	2.64	-2.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IFED vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFED Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFED and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IFED	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12	1.13	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.40	+0.24

Drawdowns

IFED vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFED drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -60.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFED and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFED	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.36%	-60.84%	+38.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.65%	-59.55%	+44.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.50%	-4.84%	-0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.84%	-22.06%	+16.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.75%	24.57%	-18.82%

Volatility

IFED vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) is 4.50%, while MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a volatility of 16.40%. This indicates that IFED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IFED	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.50%	16.40%	-11.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.86%	44.77%	-31.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.21%	57.50%	-41.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.88%	78.60%	-58.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.88%	78.60%	-58.72%

IFED vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFED has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 2.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFED vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither IFED nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IFED and FNGU in my portfolio?

IFED and FNGU have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IFED or FNGU?

FNGU has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to IFED (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFED dropped -22.36% vs FNGU's -60.84%.

Which ETF is better, IFED or FNGU?

On 1-year performance, FNGU leads with 64.67% vs 1.97% for IFED. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IFED or FNGU?

Over the 1-year period, FNGU has performed better with a 64.67% return vs 1.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IFED or FNGU?

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IFED or FNGU?

IFED and FNGU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IFED and FNGU?

IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). They also come from different issuers: UBS and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IFED and 2.60% for FNGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.